Re: now I think this is a bug

2000-12-11 Thread Mate Wierdl
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 07:47:50AM +0100, Thomas Esser wrote: export PATH=/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu:$PATH ... TEXMFMAIN ``/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i686-pc/share/texmf'' seems to have Whow. Cool. Can you please $ kpsewhich -expand-var='$SELFAUTOLOC -- $SELFAUTODIR --

Re: now I think this is a bug

2000-12-11 Thread Mate Wierdl
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 12:51:38PM +, Joao Palhoto Matos wrote: On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Thomas Esser wrote: This glibc is a very recent version. So, the rest of your system is likely to be very "bleeding edge", too? Well, I suspect that we run into some compiler bug here... Thomas

Re: now I think this is a bug

2000-12-11 Thread Mate Wierdl
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 09:58:13AM +0100, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote: + Mate Wierdl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | So I decided to reinstall teTeX without doing any configuration: | | # rm -rf /usr/local/teTeX/ | # mkdir -p /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf | # gzip -dc teTeX-texmf-1.0.tar.gz | (umask

Re: now I think this is a bug

2000-12-11 Thread Mate Wierdl
-- --- Mate Wierdl | Dept. of Math. Sciences | University of Memphis

Re: still problems with bookman

2000-12-10 Thread Mate Wierdl
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 10:00:50AM +0100, Thomas Esser wrote: Hi Mate, I just have noticed, that you have unsuccessfully tried to extend the TEXMF list. You did uncomment TEXMF = {$HOMETEXMF,!!$TEXMFLOCAL,!!$TEXMFMAIN,$HOME} but you did not comment TEXMF = !!$TEXMFMAIN (the same

now I think this is a bug

2000-12-10 Thread Mate Wierdl
So I decided to reinstall teTeX without doing any configuration: # rm -rf /usr/local/teTeX/ # mkdir -p /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf # gzip -dc teTeX-texmf-1.0.tar.gz | (umask 0; cd /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf; tar xf -) # gzip -dc teTeX-src-1.0.tar.gz | tar xvf - # cd teTeX-1.0 # sh -c

still problems with bookman

2000-12-08 Thread Mate Wierdl
xdvi /usr/local/teTeX/bin/xdvi My system is a RedHat 7.0 Linux (kernel-2.2.16). Thx for any help. -- --- Mate Wierdl | Dept. of Math. Sciences | University of Memphis

Re: problems with bookman.sty

2000-11-23 Thread Mate Wierdl
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 08:55:32AM +0100, Thomas Esser wrote: Hi Mate, is xdvi installed in the same directory as kpsewhich? I guess not and I guess that this is the problem. Please, check that the location is ok and that the right programs are found along $PATH. I have which xdvi

problems with bookman.sty

2000-11-22 Thread Mate Wierdl
I am trying to compile \documentclass{article} \usepackage{bookman} \begin{document} Hello \end{document} In fact, compilation goes fine, but then when I try to preview, and I get $ xdvi a $ kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode ljfivemp --bdpi 600 --mag 1+0/600 --dpi 600 pbkl7t mktexpk:

Re: problems with bookman.sty

2000-11-22 Thread Mate Wierdl
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 10:38:41PM +0100, Thomas Esser wrote: $ xdvi a $ kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode ljfivemp --bdpi 600 --mag 1+0/600 --dpi 600 pbkl7t mktexpk: Running mf \mode:=ljfivemp; mag:=1+0/600; nonstopmode; input pbkl7t The problem is that xdvi does not find

xdvik and XFree86-4 update

2000-10-05 Thread Mate Wierdl
OK, so I recompiled teTeX-1.07 against XFree86-4.0.1, and the buttons are back. But what a pain. This also means that RH 7.0 users will not complain since they get a tetex package which is compiled against the new XFree86. Mate

Re: xdvi's buttons are missing

2000-10-02 Thread Mate Wierdl
xdvi +expert the 'x' keystroke No buttons with xdvik. Or, more precise, the place for the buttinlist is there, but it is empty. Is this different from what you were reporting earlier? If we are talking about xdvik: using the `x' keystroke while xdvi open or opening xdvi