Re: listings.sty is missing?

2003-03-15 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
be no more mentioned. -- Staszek Wawrykiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ANN: teTeX-2.0.2

2003-03-03 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
As for tetex-2.0.2 * remove g-brief: it is not free software it would be also wise to remove from texmf/texdoctk/texdoctk.dat: g-brief;Alternative german letter style (g-brief);latex/g-brief/g-brief.dvi; (2 occurences), thought German friends could be unhappy... -- Staszek Wawrykiewicz

Re: europs.sty in 2.0(.1)

2003-02-22 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
provided by URW++. As those fonts are also GPL licensed, anybody can feel free to adapt them to make just work as you would like. -- Staszek Wawrykiewicz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Quick question regarding -src-specials

2002-12-01 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
-version that ends up with x, 7.3.7x I think. As concerned TL7, it is still: This is TeX, Version 3.14159 (Web2C 7.3.7x) I think it is intentionally, so we have the same binaries for all (GUST, TUG, DANTE, TUG2002, CSTUG CD TeX Live 7 releases). -- Staszek Wawrykiewicz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Font problem or not?

2002-11-26 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
26 Nov 2002 Reinhard Kotucha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Staszek Wawrykiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems somehow strange. Why both map files differ? As I understand the whole mechanism, different map files for dvips and pdftex are only needed when we use fonts from the standard set

Re: Font problem or not?

2002-10-30 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
.tfm files. If (for some reason) we have two different map files, we can always declare them in config.ps and pdftex.cfg, respectively (p +mymap.map). -- Staszek Wawrykiewicz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [OffTopic] Curious to know whether latex2html is current?

2001-07-25 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
observed that latex2html (the same version!) is still mirrored on CTAN everyday ;-} -- Staszek Wawrykiewicz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ec - fonts

2000-10-24 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
file ecrm.mf). You would better running latex file to make EC fonts automagically: \documentclass{article} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % switch to EC fonts \begin{document} some text \em{some more} {\bf etc.} \end{document} Staszek Wawrykiewicz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: teTeX 1.0 vs. 0.4

2000-05-30 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
. Joao Palhoto Matos wrote: Please read the documentation for graphicx. This matter is unrelated to teTeX proper. This matter *is related* to teTeX proper. ;-) Somehow more then reading the documentation for graphicx. Staszek Wawrykiewicz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: teTeX 1.0 vs. 0.4

2000-05-19 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
./texmf/tex/generic/dvips/ It should be there... or you forgot to rebuild ls-R databases: run texhash Staszek Wawrykiewicz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

texmf.cnf for BLU

2000-03-10 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
). The last question: if pdf* do not use psfonts.map from the dvips/config/ (or it use it as the last resort) why it use the same file name? Some time ago it used pdftex.map and it was enought clear... I remember Thomas' work with updmap. Perhaps old ideas are not so bad... Staszek Wawrykiewicz email