Re: [OffTopic] Curious to know whether latex2html is current?
Neil Zanella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Either way some gif images will be created when typesetting math > and other stuff like chemistry etc.. if that is what you want. [...] True. But the nice thing about latex2html is that you can use it to take a 500pg LaTeX document and put it on the web. You would _not_ do that with dvi2bitmap. They serve completely different needs. -- Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors! Violence is molding.
Re: [OffTopic] Curious to know whether latex2html is current?
Neil Zanella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why not just go with dvi2bitmap: Because it creates bitmaps and not html? -- Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors! Cats sleep on shelves like motorized bookends.
Re: [OffTopic] Curious to know whether latex2html is current?
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Walter Tautz wrote: > I was wondering if latex2html is still the way to > go about converting latex to html? Is latex2html > still being actively maintained, if so, where? > If not where is the most recent version? Is > there a mail list where one can post problems? I have only observed that latex2html (the same version!) is still mirrored on CTAN everyday ;-} -- Staszek Wawrykiewicz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OffTopic] Curious to know whether latex2html is current?
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Alan Shutko wrote: > Neil Zanella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Why not just go with dvi2bitmap: > > Because it creates bitmaps and not html? Either way some gif images will be created when typesetting math and other stuff like chemistry etc.. if that is what you want. Another thing to keep in mind is portability with different browsers. And thirdly it is much neater to keep one png file on your desktop rather than a bunch of different files. But it's entirely up to you. N.
Re: [OffTopic] Curious to know whether latex2html is current?
Why not just go with dvi2bitmap: http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/star/dvi2bitmap/ -- Neil On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Walter Tautz wrote: > > I was wondering if latex2html is still the way to > go about converting latex to html? Is latex2html > still being actively maintained, if so, where? > If not where is the most recent version? Is > there a mail list where one can post problems? > > -walter > >
Re: [OffTopic] Curious to know whether latex2html is current?
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 10:01:43AM -0400, Walter Tautz wrote: > > I was wondering if latex2html is still the way to > go about converting latex to html? Is latex2html > still being actively maintained, if so, where? > If not where is the most recent version? Is > there a mail list where one can post problems? I think all your queries are answered by visiting URL: http://www.tug.org/mailman/listinfo/latex2html ... but the first two short answers are: Yes. and Yes. Regards, Greg Gamble ___ Greg Gamble __ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Lehrstuhl D fuer Mathematik Tel: +49 241 804545 Templergraben 64 52062 Aachen, Germany http://www.math.rwth-aachen.de/~Greg.Gamble ___
[OffTopic] Curious to know whether latex2html is current?
I was wondering if latex2html is still the way to go about converting latex to html? Is latex2html still being actively maintained, if so, where? If not where is the most recent version? Is there a mail list where one can post problems? -walter
