On 2001-09-20 19:56:43 +0400, Vladimir Volovich wrote:
MS == Martin Schröder writes:
MS GPL? So anybody can distribute changed versions? LPPL please.
GPL insists that any modified versions must be distributed under GPL
(freely). Does LPPL enforce this too? (i did not find this in the text
AFAIK the AFPL is not compatible with distribution on the TeXlive
and CTAN cds. :-(
i will re-release the fonts under GNU GPL in a few days.
That's good.
note, however, that TeX Live and teTeX include URW fonts released under AFPL
(i.e. not from the GNU Ghostscript), and noone
On 2001-09-20 11:46:37 +0400, Vladimir Volovich wrote:
Martin Schröder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AFAIK the AFPL is not compatible with distribution on the TeXlive
and CTAN cds. :-(
i will re-release the fonts under GNU GPL in a few days.
GPL? So anybody can distribute changed versions?
MS == Martin Schröder writes:
MS GPL? So anybody can distribute changed versions? LPPL please.
GPL insists that any modified versions must be distributed under GPL
(freely). Does LPPL enforce this too? (i did not find this in the text
of LPPL).
Which version of the ß did you use? The one
Vladimir == Vladimir Volovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Vladimir if ß in CM has the same metric values, i could replace it in the
Vladimir CM-Super fonts.
It has.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2001-09-18 21:38:49 +0400, Vladimir Volovich wrote:
Copyright (c) 2001 Vladimir Volovich [EMAIL PROTECTED].
See the file PUBLIC (Aladdin Free Public License) for license conditions.
AFAIK the AFPL is not compatible with distribution on the TeXlive
and CTAN cds. :-(
The CM-super package
