gt; Is that right?
It means that -G1 (as set e.g. via -Ppdf) does no longer produce
incorrect output. The remapping of characters works for computer modern,
but it does not work for a lot of other fonts. The new dvips decides o
Kalyan Mukherjea wrote:
Hi Dmitri,
Fromwhere did you download the files? Thomas had sent me the
url:
http://www.dbs.uni-hannover.de/~te/dvips5.92a/
On that page there are 3 links:
to Thomas's web page (Parent directory)
a dvips*.tar.gz file which contains the necessary run time files;
and
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Kalyan Mukherjea wrote:
> Hi Dmitri,
>Fromwhere did you download the files? Thomas had sent me the
> url:
> http://www.dbs.uni-hannover.de/~te/dvips5.92a/
>
> On that page there are 3 links:
> to Thomas's web page (Parent directory)
> a dvips*.tar.gz file which contai
Hi Dmitri,
Fromwhere did you download the files? Thomas had sent me the
url:
http://www.dbs.uni-hannover.de/~te/dvips5.92a/
On that page there are 3 links:
to Thomas's web page (Parent directory)
a dvips*.tar.gz file which contains the necessary run time files;
and
_dvips_ which is a binar
does no longer produce
incorrect output. The remapping of characters works for computer modern,
but it does not work for a lot of other fonts. The new dvips decides on
a per-font basis whether to remap it or not and it only remaps if that
won't mess up the result.
Thomas
Hi,
I downloaded and compiled version 5.92 of dvips.
When we say that the character shifting issue has been corrected,
do we mean that
dvips -Ppdf ... without either -G or -G0,
now works for computer modern, adobe postscript, and combinations of them?
Is that right?
Dimitri