, because I don't see how one could remove
settings completely in this way.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
know whether the Author, Mark A. Wicks, is still interested
in the package, and can be contacted at the address given in the README
file, [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm just wondering because dvipdfm didn't
change at all since 2.0.2
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian
. Alternatively, there
might be some 3.0.1 minor release in a couple of months (just a guess),
where the fix might go in if you don't have time at present.
I'm Cc-ing the tetex beta list in order to notify them of the progress.
Happy TeX'ing,
Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian
): Don't abort if libtool returns an error;
| remove $(library).a.
| (distclean): Remove any conftest* cruft that may remain.
`
but clean.mk isn't ac_include'd in texk/Makefile.in
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
/teTeX-beta/tetex-src-2.99.9.20050111-beta.tar.gz
It seems you only uploaded the md5sum files - I cannot find the tar.gz's
themselves, and the symlinks still point to 2.99.8
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Thomas Esser [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 11:44:25AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
is it really necessary that ConTeXt has two config directories,
It has two directories which are named config. That's a fact. I don't
know if users have to change the files in there. I guess
reference to `tputs'
[...]
Do you have any ideas? Thanks in advance.
Since texinfo is in a separate package in Debian, I never tried
this. A look at what the texinfo package does to the sources will
probably solve this; or simply configure --without-texinfo.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
was a binary. It's just a symlink - to tex in 2.0.2, and to
pdfetex in 2.99.3. Didn't check 2.99.5 yet, but I'd be surprised if this
had changed. Probably etex is also a symlink to pdfetex; pdftex surely
is. Only tex should be a separate binary.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Feb 15 2000
+# * accept gzipped files on input
+# * temporary directory set according to TMPDIR
+#
+#Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2004-11-23
+# * do not uncompress dvi.gz, xdvi can handle this
+# * go to background with uncompressed files
+
test -f /bin/sh5 test
).
And I sent a patch for teTeX 2.0.2 which has not yet reached me again
through the list. I fear I might have sent a wrong patch that still
contained code that would be optimised away by compilers. Here's the
correct one.
Bye, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian
/show_bug.cgi?id=2748
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
../../libs/t1lib/lib/t1lib -I../kpathsea -I/usr/X11R6/include -O2 -c xdvi.c -o
xdvi.o
Regards, Frank
[1] the new stable version will be released soon
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
Hi Stefan, hi all,
in texk/xdvi/Makefile.in installation of t1mapper [$(perlprog)] is
commented out, but the manpage is still installed. One of this is
probably wrong...
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
, but I wouldn't be surprised if such a user does a
rm -rf /etc/X11 if he finds this directory.
What do you think?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
17 matches
Mail list logo