texconfig action and site-wide changes

2005-02-07 Thread Frank Küster
Hi all, [Something completely different, which I found while looking at this: It seems to me that texconfig-sys init should call fmtutil-sys and updmap-sys, too, not fmtutil and updmap plain - I didn't check for texlinks.] I have tried to understand how texconfig works if a user invokes it. As

Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0

2005-02-07 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Bertalan Fodor writes: I've found the problem, but I'm still not sure in solution: there is an mf.base file in /usr/share/texmf/web2c That's strange. But texconfig creates its formats in /var/lib/texmf/web2c That's correct. So mf looks at the wrong place for mf.base Can you find out

Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0

2005-02-07 Thread Bertalan Fodor
Thanks for suggesting looking at texmf.cnf I've found the following: TEXMFMAIN = /usr/share/texmf TEXMFCONFIG = $TEXMFMAIN % - make sure that $TEXMFVAR precedes $TEXMFMAIN in the TEXMF definition. TEXMF = {!!$TEXMFCONFIG,!!$TEXMFVAR,!!$TEXMFMAIN,$TEXMFHOME,!!$TEXMFLOCAL,!!$TEXMFDIST} As you

Re: 2.99.7 ConTeXt, URW-Fonts

2005-02-07 Thread Martin Schröder
On 2004-12-27 20:18:50 +0100, Hartmut Henkel wrote: And the following missing files generate cannot open font map file warnings: ec-public-pfl.map ec-urw-palatino.map These two files i couldn't find anywhere, but it seems that it's harmless when they are missing. Hans, what's the story

mf-nowin, mfw and mf

2005-02-07 Thread Giuseppe Ghibò
Hi Thomas, I'm currently RPM-packaging tetex 3.0, and a found a problem with mf, mf-nowin and mfw. At least I'm a bit confused about it. In the past there was 'mfw' and 'mf-nowin' executable, the first was compiled with window support (and thus linked with X11 libraries) and 'mf-nowin' which