Re: texmfsrc LICENSE

2003-02-02 Thread Roozbeh Pournader
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Paul Vojta wrote: It compiles and works under Debian Linux And Red Hat Linux 8.0. roozbeh

Re: Possible byte-order problems in TeX format files with -rc1

2003-02-02 Thread Thomas Esser
I'm sharing format, pool and base files between a sparc64 (32-bit userspace) box and an i386 box --- or I was; but between 20021225 and -rc1, the byte-order independence of these files has broken, even without NO_DUMP_SHARE; all .base, .fmt. .efmt and .mem files differ between those platforms

Re: Possible byte-order problems in TeX format files with -rc1

2003-02-02 Thread Olaf Weber
nix writes: I'm sharing format, pool and base files between a sparc64 (32-bit userspace) box and an i386 box --- or I was; but between 20021225 and -rc1, the byte-order independence of these files has broken, even without NO_DUMP_SHARE; all .base, .fmt. .efmt and .mem files differ between

Re: Possible byte-order problems in TeX format files with -rc1

2003-02-02 Thread Nix
On 02 Feb 2003, Olaf Weber uttered the following: nix writes: I'm sharing format, pool and base files between a sparc64 (32-bit userspace) box and an i386 box --- or I was; but between 20021225 and -rc1, the byte-order independence of these files has broken, even without NO_DUMP_SHARE; all

teTeX-2.0

2003-02-02 Thread Thomas Esser
Well, a long time has been around since teTeX-1.0 ... I hereby proudly presend: === teTeX 2.0 === This is the announce of