Re: teTeX-2.0.1

2003-02-17 Thread Thomas Esser
> --- texk/etc/autoconf/acspecific.m4.orig Mon Feb 3 18:47:42 2003 > +++ texk/etc/autoconf/acspecific.m4 Mon Feb 3 18:48:02 2003 > @@ -1754,7 +1754,7 @@ > #ifdef HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H > #include > #endif > -extern select >($ac_cv_func_select_arg1,$ac_cv_func_select_arg234,$ac_cv_func_sele

Re: teTeX-2.0.1

2003-02-17 Thread Albert Chin
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 08:34:36PM +0100, Olaf Weber wrote: > Luc Van Eycken writes: > > > Hi, > > I just tried to compile teTeX 2.0.1 and I encountered a configuration > > problem on some platforms. Due to the additional inclusion of > > in AC_PATH_X_DIRECT, the number of arguments of XtMalloc >

Re: teTeX-2.0.1

2003-02-17 Thread Olaf Weber
Luc Van Eycken writes: > Hi, > I just tried to compile teTeX 2.0.1 and I encountered a configuration > problem on some platforms. Due to the additional inclusion of > in AC_PATH_X_DIRECT, the number of arguments of XtMalloc > is checked. But the correct number of arguments of XtMalloc is 1 and no

Re: teTeX-2.0.1

2003-02-17 Thread Luc Van Eycken
Hi, I just tried to compile teTeX 2.0.1 and I encountered a configuration problem on some platforms. Due to the additional inclusion of in AC_PATH_X_DIRECT, the number of arguments of XtMalloc is checked. But the correct number of arguments of XtMalloc is 1 and not 0, resulting in a configuration