Re: is entry for omega in fmtutil.in okay?

2002-10-24 Thread Thomas Esser 
> so its main action was "texconfig init", I believe.

Ah, yes. And that calls "fmtutil --all". I was not aware of the fact that
"fmtutil --all" tries to locate all hyphen setup files using kpsewhich.
This does not make sense and I have fixed this now in fmtutil (even
though the real bug was in fmtutil.cnf).

> I hope this explanation is useful enough for you.

Yes, thanks.

Thomas

PS: if anybody is interested, here is the patch.

--- teTeX-src-beta-20021022/texk/tetex/fmtutil  Tue Oct 22 23:50:27 2002
+++ teTeX-src-beta/texk/tetex/fmtutil   Fri Oct 25 02:29:37 2002
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 
 ###
 # program history:
+#   Fri Oct 25 02:29:06 CEST 2002: now more careful about find_hyphenfile()
 #   Tue Oct 22 22:46:48 CEST 2002: -jobname, oft extension
 #   Fri Oct  4 22:33:17 CEST 2002: add more cli stuff: enablefmt
 #  disablefmt listcfg
@@ -259,6 +260,7 @@
   cnf_file=# global variable: full name of the config file
   cmd= # desired action from command line
   needsCleanup=false
+  need_find_hyphenfile=false
 
   # mktexfmtMode: if called as mktexfmt, set to true. Will echo the generated
   # filename after successful generation to stdout then (and nothing else).
@@ -503,7 +505,10 @@
 find_hyphenfile()
 {
   format="$1"; hyphenation="$2"
-  kpsewhich -progname="$format" -format=tex "$hyphenation"
+  case $hyphenation in
+-) ;;
+*) kpsewhich -progname="$format" -format=tex "$hyphenation";;
+  esac
 }
 
 ###
@@ -593,7 +598,9 @@
 ###
 check_match()
 {
-  this_hyphenfile=`find_hyphenfile "$format" "$hyphenation"`
+  $need_find_hyphenfile && \
+this_hyphenfile=`find_hyphenfile "$format" "$hyphenation"`
+
   eval $match_cmd && setmatch true
 }
 
@@ -638,6 +645,7 @@
 {
   hyphenfile=$1
 
+  need_find_hyphenfile=true
   match_cmd="test x\$this_hyphenfile = x$hyphenfile"
 
   # No match before the loop:

Re: is entry for omega in fmtutil.in okay?

2002-10-24 Thread Atsuhito Kohda 
From: Thomas Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: is entry for omega in fmtutil.in okay?
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 01:11:40 +0200

> > Well, I am not sure if I could say this as "fmtutil complained"
> > but it displayed as follows and I guessed it was caused
> > by "-.dat" for omega.
> > 
> >Running initex. This may take some time. ...
> >kpsewhich: unrecognized option `-.dat'
> 
> I don't know what you are doing. The strings "Running initex" and "This
> may take some time" are not contained anywhere in the sources of teTeX.
> What action causes this error?

Ah, sorry for my insufficient explanation.
I made Debian packages and installed them.  The action 
above was done with their post-installation scripts.

In this case, it was done as follows(excerpt);

TEXCONFIG_P=/usr/bin/texconfig

echo "Running initex. This may take some time. ..."
$TEXCONFIG_P init > $TEMPFILE
echo "Output of initex is in $TEMPFILE"

so its main action was "texconfig init", I believe.

I hope this explanation is useful enough for you.

Best regards,  2002/10/25

-- 
 Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.

Re: is entry for omega in fmtutil.in okay?

2002-10-24 Thread Atsuhito Kohda 
From: Thomas Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: is entry for omega in fmtutil.in okay?
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:14:12 +0200

> > It seemed fmtutil complained about "-.dat" to me.
> 
> Hm... I can run "fmtutil --all" or "fmtutil --byfmt omega" without any
> error. What did you do to get a complaint?

Well, I am not sure if I could say this as "fmtutil complained"
but it displayed as follows and I guessed it was caused
by "-.dat" for omega.

   Running initex. This may take some time. ...
   kpsewhich: unrecognized option `-.dat'

Thanks for your reply.

Best regards,   2002/10/25

-- 
 Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima

Re: is entry for omega in fmtutil.in okay?

2002-10-24 Thread Thomas Esser 
> Well, I am not sure if I could say this as "fmtutil complained"
> but it displayed as follows and I guessed it was caused
> by "-.dat" for omega.
> 
>Running initex. This may take some time. ...
>kpsewhich: unrecognized option `-.dat'

I don't know what you are doing. The strings "Running initex" and "This
may take some time" are not contained anywhere in the sources of teTeX.
What action causes this error?

Thomas

Re: is entry for omega in fmtutil.in okay?

2002-10-24 Thread Thomas Esser 

> I noticed that generated fmtutil.cnf in teTeX-src-beta-20021022.tar.gz
> contained the entry 
> 
> omega omega   -.dat   omega.ini

That's a bug, thanks for the report. "-.dat" should just be "-".

> It seemed fmtutil complained about "-.dat" to me.

Hm... I can run "fmtutil --all" or "fmtutil --byfmt omega" without any
error. What did you do to get a complaint?

Thomas

is entry for omega in fmtutil.in okay?

2002-10-24 Thread Atsuhito Kohda 
Hi,

I noticed that generated fmtutil.cnf in teTeX-src-beta-20021022.tar.gz
contained the entry 

omega   omega   -.dat   omega.ini

It seemed fmtutil complained about "-.dat" to me.

Is "-.dat" really intentional or typo ?

My system is Debian GNU/Linux of unstable (i.e. the latest)
version.

Best regards, 2002/10/24

-- 
 Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima