ude ], [${x_direct_test_function}(1)],
> [LIBS="$ac_save_LIBS"
> # We can link X programs with no special library path.
> ac_x_libraries=],
I applied that patch "by hand" for teTeX-2.0.1 and I overlooked the
argument to ${x_direct_test_function}:
AC_TRY_LINK([#include ], [${x_direct_test_function}()],
Sorry...
Thomas
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 08:34:36PM +0100, Olaf Weber wrote:
> Luc Van Eycken writes:
>
> > Hi,
> > I just tried to compile teTeX 2.0.1 and I encountered a configuration
> > problem on some platforms. Due to the additional inclusion of
> > in AC_PATH_X_DIRECT, the n
Luc Van Eycken writes:
> Hi,
> I just tried to compile teTeX 2.0.1 and I encountered a configuration
> problem on some platforms. Due to the additional inclusion of
> in AC_PATH_X_DIRECT, the number of arguments of XtMalloc
> is checked. But the correct number of arguments of Xt
Hi,
I just tried to compile teTeX 2.0.1 and I encountered a configuration
problem on some platforms. Due to the additional inclusion of
in AC_PATH_X_DIRECT, the number of arguments of XtMalloc
is checked. But the correct number of arguments of XtMalloc is 1 and not 0,
resulting in a
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 08:07:17AM +0100, Thomas Esser wrote:
> ===
> teTeX 2.0.1
> ===
the rpms have been syn
===
teTeX 2.0.1
===
This is the announce of teTeX-2.0.1, a TeX distribution for UNIX
compatible systems
