Re: teTeX beta 20011202 epstopdf

2002-02-12 Thread Reinhard Kotucha
> "Siep" == Siep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Named configuration files would sound reasonable, with some > prepackaged ones provided. Agreed. Another idea is not to pass the parameters via cmdline/environment but put them directly into the ps-code << /AutoFilterColorImages false

Re: teTeX beta 20011202 epstopdf

2002-02-12 Thread Siep
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:20:35 +0100 (MET) Heiko Oberdiek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Siep wrote: > > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2002 19:59:04 +0100 (MET) > > Heiko Oberdiek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > It is possible to set the environment variable GS_OPTIONS, > > > for exam

Re: teTeX beta 20011202 epstopdf

2002-02-11 Thread Reinhard Kotucha
> "Siep" == Siep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> GS_OPTIONS="-dPDFSETTINGS=/prepress -dAuto...=false ..." >> epstopdf ... >> >> Yours sincerely Heiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Yes, this also worked. Thanks. Still, I think extra options for > epstopdf would be better. Do

Re: teTeX beta 20011202 epstopdf

2002-02-11 Thread Heiko Oberdiek
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Siep wrote: > On Sun, 10 Feb 2002 19:59:04 +0100 (MET) > Heiko Oberdiek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It is possible to set the environment variable GS_OPTIONS, > > for example, in a bash: > > > > GS_OPTIONS="-dPDFSETTINGS=/prepress -dAuto...=false ..." epstopdf ... > >

Re: teTeX beta 20011202 epstopdf

2002-02-11 Thread Harald Koenig
On Feb 10, Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 07:00:28PM +0100, Siep wrote: > > > > I propose that command-line options be added to epstopdf to request > > prepress-quality pdfs and to suppress jpeg compression; jpeg compression > > is not a good compression technique for e.g. scre

Re: teTeX beta 20011202 epstopdf

2002-02-10 Thread Martin Schroeder
On 2002-02-10 20:03:12 +, Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 07:00:28PM +0100, Siep wrote: > > I propose that command-line options be added to epstopdf to request > > prepress-quality pdfs and to suppress jpeg compression; jpeg compression > > is not a good compression technique

Re: teTeX beta 20011202 epstopdf

2002-02-10 Thread Sebastian Rahtz
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 07:00:28PM +0100, Siep wrote: > > I propose that command-line options be added to epstopdf to request > prepress-quality pdfs and to suppress jpeg compression; jpeg compression > is not a good compression technique for e.g. screenshots. If you have JPEG files, why don't

Re: teTeX beta 20011202 epstopdf

2002-02-10 Thread Heiko Oberdiek
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Siep wrote: > It appears that epstopdf doesn't offer all the command-line options needed > for optimal conversion of images. With the options supplied and with > gs6.50 from Debian Woody, all I could get was downsampled jpegs. > > After some correspondence with Piet van Oostr

teTeX beta 20011202 epstopdf

2002-02-10 Thread Siep
It appears that epstopdf doesn't offer all the command-line options needed for optimal conversion of images. With the options supplied and with gs6.50 from Debian Woody, all I could get was downsampled jpegs. After some correspondence with Piet van Oostrum I came up with a private version of epst