From: Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#182772: dvipdfm can't find ot1r.enc
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 11:30:40 +0900 (JST)
> > teTeX *has* encoding files for all text fonts of the CM set. They are
> > extracted from the BSR type1 files and should be 100% co
From: Thomas Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#182772: dvipdfm can't find ot1r.enc
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 22:54:32 +0100
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 08:53:39AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > It seemed ot1*.enc (ot1.enc, ot1alt.enc, ot1r.enc)
> > were really mis
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 08:53:39AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> It seemed ot1*.enc (ot1.enc, ot1alt.enc, ot1r.enc)
> were really missing.
Nothing in (the original) teTeX refers to these files. Correct me if I
am wrong. If something in debian refers to these files, debian should
provide them.
te
Hi all, we Debian tetex-maintainers got the following
report.
From: Marko Mäkelä <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Bug#182772: dvipdfm can't find ot1r.enc
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 22:04:18 +0200
> The dvipdfm command fails for documents containing ot1r encoded
> fonts (especially math fonts), which make
