(This reply doesn't seem important enough to explicitly cc the people
you did.)
- Every language would contain an additional folder with the name of
that language (patterns for English, Greek, German, Latin, Mongolian,
Serbian would end up in the same folder;
Why?
Something
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:15:44AM +0200, Claudio Beccari wrote:
> I am keen to any naming policy, but I am not keen to delete any pattern file
We're not going to delete anything.
Arthur
> I thought about this and I think the best solution is to add an extension to
> FOP to handle the cases that cannot nicely fit in language plus country
> pattern.
I do not know enough about FOP to comment, but that sounds like a good
idea. In any case, if you could get rid of nonsensical tags
I am keen to any naming policy, but I am not keen to delete any pattern
file because it does not fit into the language-country template. Let's
not speak of Latin pattern files, for which I already spent several
gallons of elbow grease, and for which there is no country to match the
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> Question : What does ".yaml" mean ?
>
> "YAML Ain't Markup Language" / "Yet Another Markup Language"
>
> See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YAML#Examples
>
> It's human-readable and computer-parsable format that would replace
> free-form text in the "headers" of
On 11 April 2016 at 08:46, Philip Taylor wrote:
> The proposal is too complex for me to comprehend properly at this early
> hour of the day; I will try to look at it when I am more awake. In the
> mean time, one observation and one question :
>
> Observation : *.LICENSE" is mis-spelled; it
The proposal is too complex for me to comprehend properly at this early
hour of the day; I will try to look at it when I am more awake. In the
mean time, one observation and one question :
Observation : *.LICENSE" is mis-spelled; it should read *.LICENCE (the
form with "s" is for the verb, the
(I'm removing a few people from CC because I'm not sure if they want
to get involved in a longer discussion, but they need to be aware of
the changes.)
On 11 April 2016 at 07:33, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>> We also need a reasonable name for the complete collection of those
>> patterns. Something
