Hi!
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Don Simons wrote:
> I can't remember why I ever coded up the replacement digits. Why would
> anyone ever want to use them?
I am grateful that you did. I used it for example in
http://www.lysator.liu.se/~tuben/scores/berstson/berstssc.pdf page 52, bar
84. The original has
Col. G. L. Sicherman wrote
> Don Simons wrote
> > I can't remember why I ever coded up the replacement digits. Why would
> > anyone ever want to use them?
>
> I sometimes use "5", "6", and "2".
>
So do I, whenever there are 5, 6, or 2 notes in the xtuplet. And PMX
automatically puts in the correct
The problem Andre pointed out is that when he used AT in PMX to activate
Col. S's brackets, and when one got too narrow, no space was left for the
numeral. After some testing, I believe this is a flaw in tuplet.tex. PMX
puts in a little extra blank space after the digit, but does nothing else to
ch
--- Olivier Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
Sorry, I forgot the \begin{document}
>
thank you very much, i was working with musixtex
because i am familiar with latex and i thought it
would be easier for me to work with musixtex but i
find it harder than latex. i will learn PMX right
away.
i als
Sorry, I forgot the \begin{document}
___
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Dear Jesus,
Here is a corrected version of your example:
\documentclass{report}
\input musixtex
\smallmusicsize \instrumentnumber{1} \setstaffs 1{2}
\setclef{1}{6 0}
\generalmeter{\meterfrac{4}{4}}\generalsignature{-4}
\startmuflex
\startpiece
\Notes|\qa{'ee}\enotes\notes|\Qqbl ljkl\enotes
\def
> Could you provide a more concrete example of what
> you want to get and
> your code which gives the problem?
>
> regards
> Bernhard
here it is, the first is the code has it is now. the
second is one of my tries with bad result.
in the second example i know that notes belonging to
the beam sho
> Some things still need to be tweaked on it, but if people want to use
> it, I'll keep working on it. I posted the original message and received
> no feedback so assumed that no one was interested in it. But I guess
> that's not so?
As i understand, you've got yourself at least three fans. :-) I
Sorry, I forgot the attachment.
ccn.
--
Prof.Dr. Cornelius C. NoackPhones:
Inst. f. Theor. Physik FB 1 office : +49 (421) 218-2427
Universit"at Bremen secretary: -2422
Otto-Hahn-Allee Fax : -4869
--On Tuesday, April 20, 2004 3:06 PM +0200 Stefan Svensson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have made a simple PMX editing mode for Emacs.
>
Excellent,
how can I get it?
See Jeremy Cowgars home page, which he mentioned in his original post:
http://jeremy.cowgar.com/music/
Some things still nee
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Andre Van Ryckeghem wrote:
> I mean the 2 parts of the bracket should be more apart.
> Now the '3' shows as it is cross out.
>
> Andre
> - Original Message -
> From: "Cornelius C. Noack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Andre Van Ryckeghem wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I have made a simple PMX editing mode for Emacs.
> >
> Excellent,
> how can I get it?
See Jeremy Cowgars home page, which he mentioned in his original post:
http://jeremy.cowgar.com/music/
Strangely enough, people started asking me of where to find the Emacs
major mode, but I knew abou
> > I have made a simple PMX editing mode for Emacs.
>
> Excellent! I have been looking for this for years!
>
> Stefan
>
>
> ___
> TeX-music mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
>
Excellent,
ho
13 matches
Mail list logo
