On Tue, 29 Dec 2015, Don Simons wrote:
[...] I cringe when I see a modern typeset that has been religiously
copied from a 17th century facsimile including this outdated convention.
And I rant when I see a modern printed, expensive edition with copyright
warnings, with this feature!
age-
> From: TeX-Music [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On Behalf Of Jean-
> Pierre Coulon
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 2:44 AM
> To: Werner Icking Music Archive <tex-music@tug.org>
> Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Scope of accidentals
>
> On Tue, 29 Dec 201
I have encountered some disagreement on the scope of
accidentals. This is how I have it:
An accidental applies only to the line or interstice on which
it appears, and is implied for following notes in the same
measure, or for the first note of the next measure if tied,
unless
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015, Dirk Laurie wrote:
1. The accidental also applies to notes on the same stave
that are an octave away.
This was true in the old days. In more modern music the composers want
more often a note with an accidental at one octave and without accidendal
at another octave.
4 matches
Mail list logo
