"Dr. Gerhard Eber" <ge.e...@arcor.de> writes:

> "Dr. Gerhard Eber" <ge.e...@arcor.de> writes:
>
>> Don Simons <dsim...@roadrunner.com> writes:
>>
>>> Yes, and come to think of it, we built the MusiXTeX manual with LaTeX and
>>> with many many more than 20 \startextract...\endextract
>>>
>>> To get help, you really should post an example of a LaTeX source that fails.
>>> And be sure to also post any custom TeX files you included.
>>>
>>> --Don Simons
>>>
>> Sorry, 20 was not correct, I tried again with the latest musixflx and
>> found that it stopped working in the 2nd run after 184 pieces. The whole 
>> book would
>> contain nearly 400 pieces. All the individual pieces work with no problem.
>>
I tried to enlarge the number of sections using musixflx.lua but without
success. The problem is in the first Latex run 
which produces the .mx1 file. After a certain number of pieces no output
is produced for the rest of pieces, so there is nothing for them in the
.mx1 file. The musixflx run then produces a .mx2 file containing only
194 lineset commands. This is the reason why the second Latex run stops with 
some
error message: it fails to read the input for these pieces from the .mx2
file. The musixflx is not the culprit.

-- 
Gerhard Eber
-------------------------------
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Reply via email to