Re: [TeX-music] PMX Beta 2.505: New option for default rest positions in 2-voice staves

2004-11-15 Thread Bodo Meissner
Am 2004.11.15 16:36 schrieb(en) Don Simons: The option is available with a bit of user tweaking: enter e.g. r4+0 in one voice and r4b in the other. Hello Don, that's the way I do it now. But this is problematic if I extract or rearrange voices or change the M-Tx style (e.g. SATB to SATB4). Maybe

RE: [TeX-music] PMX Beta 2.505: New option for default rest positions in 2-voice staves

2004-11-15 Thread Don Simons
Bodo Meissner wrote > I'd wish another option: If there are simultaneous rests with the same > length in both voices, I'd like to have only one rest sign at the > single-voice default position. This notation is common for choir music. The option is available with a bit of user tweaking: enter e.g

Re: [TeX-music] PMX Beta 2.505: New option for default rest positions in 2-voice staves

2004-11-15 Thread Bodo Meissner
Am 2004.11.13 20:13 schrieb(en) Don Simons: If there are simulataneous rests in both voices, the old rule is applied. Hello Don, the automatic placement of rests sounds good. I'll try it when I have a suitable piece. I'd wish another option: If there are simultaneous rests with the same leng

Re: [TeX-music] PMX Beta 2.505: New option for default rest positions in 2-voice staves

2004-11-15 Thread Christof Biebricher
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Don Simons wrote: > I've just uploaded a new beta to > > http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx2505.zip > Thank you, Don. There is still a big wish on my list, which I mentioned already some years ago. Polyphonic organ music very frequently demands that a key is not