Re: [tex4ht] [bug #276] avoid multiple runs of latex

2016-03-30 Thread Michal Hoftich
> I'm wondering whether, rather than deciding in advance how many latex runs are > needed, it would be sufficient simply for each latex run to search the latex > log file for > ' Rerun to get ' > Doesn't that support only LaTeX cross-references? We need additional runs to get tex4ht links correct

Re: [tex4ht] [bug #274] tex4ht features vs. lwarp vs. ...

2016-03-30 Thread William F Hammond
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Michal wrote, quoting CVR: > The user needs to tag math as $a_{\mathbf{n}}$ for perfect MathML output > > without intervention. Another common example found in documents is $(a > > $), this would be passed by TeX, but not MathML since the closing > > parenthes

Re: [tex4ht] [bug #276] avoid multiple runs of latex

2016-03-30 Thread William F Hammond
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Michal Hoftich wrote: > make4ht and tex4ebook support --mode option, which can influence the > compilation. . . . > I'm wondering whether, rather than deciding in advance how many latex runs are needed, it would be sufficient simply for each latex run to search

[tex4ht] [bug #277] make timestamps in HTML output optional

2016-03-30 Thread Michal Hoftich
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #277 (project tex4ht): OK, no problem, you are probably right. There is another patch :) (file #233) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: timestamp.patchSize:0 KB __