Re: [tex4ht] java modules

2020-06-07 Thread Karl Berry
speculate that the issue is that with do_java=1 we compile the java sources in two places, in the Makefile and in the t4ht system calls. Well, you created the Makefile invocations. Change it as you like. I certainly agree it is wrong to compile things in two places. If it's too much work

[tex4ht] [bug #469] dedicatory in amsart is not supported

2020-06-07 Thread Michal Hoftich
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #469 (project tex4ht): I hopefully fixed that in the sources. The fix was to add the \par command at the end of the commands used for printing of title and author. Thanks for the report. (file #345) ___ Additional

Re: [tex4ht] xmllint calls, so many

2020-06-07 Thread Michal Hoftich
> Maybe instead of doing system calls to xmllint one could record the > file list into some file (maybe the .fls file produced by the > -recorder option is OK for that), and then one would do something like > this to make the syntax checking. > > awk '/^OUTPUT.*\.xml$/ { $1 =""; print}'

[tex4ht] [bug #469] dedicatory in amsart is not supported

2020-06-07 Thread ies9oa7N
URL: Summary: dedicatory in amsart is not supported Project: tex4ht Submitted by: saefo8ea Submitted on: Sun 07 Jun 2020 02:20:32 PM EEST Category: None Priority: 5 -

Re: [tex4ht] xmllint calls, so many

2020-06-07 Thread Vincent Belaïche
Maybe instead of doing system calls to xmllint one could record the file list into some file (maybe the .fls file produced by the -recorder option is OK for that), and then one would do something like this to make the syntax checking. awk '/^OUTPUT.*\.xml$/ { $1 =""; print}' record_file.fls |