On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:09 AM, Nasser M. Abbasi <n...@12000.org> wrote:
> Fyi; > > I found an issue implementing a method to allow one to > make htlatex generate mathml and use mathjax. > > I was wondering if some htlatex experts can look > at this question I posted at tex forum on stackexchange > and see if there is a way to change the configuration file > shown there to avoid this problem. > > All information and details are shown here > > http://tex.stackexchange.com/**questions/109714/conversion-** > issues-using-htlatex-and-**mathjax-mathml-method<http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/109714/conversion-issues-using-htlatex-and-mathjax-mathml-method> > > I suspect it's a bug in writing the MathML rather than an issue with your config. In the first example, i.e., \documentclass[12pt]{article} \begin{document} $\dot{\alpha}$ $x \dot{x}$ \end{document} for the \dot{x} tex4ht generates U+1E8B (latin small letter x with dot above) rather than putting an ordinary 'x' inside <mover> as the \alpha is handled. I think this handling of \dot{x} is parallel to using a regular LaTeX accent rather than a math accent. Moreover, I'm wondering about the choice of dot used with the \alpha. Why choose U+0307 (combining dot above) rather than U+02D9 (dot above)? While U+0307 for the dot in \dot{\alpha} looks OK in MathJax HTML/CSS, it does not look correct if I use the menu to go for native MathML rendering in Firefox. I find that U+02D9 works both ways. -- Bill -- William F Hammond http://www.albany.edu/~hammond/ Email: gel...@gmail.com
