Re: [Texascavers] Re: underground texting

2010-02-01 Thread Brian Riordan
Yes! Quick Gill, alert the Government so they can save us from our foolish selves! Does your congressman receive texts? That might be the quickest and most efficient way to get this passed in a timely manner. If you could abbreviate your words by eliminating vowels or truncating common words

Re: [Texascavers] Re: underground texting

2010-02-01 Thread Gill Edigar
I'm behind you Brian. We gotta get this thing going before it gets any further out of hand. What good are laws if you can't restrict people's rights freedoms with um? We've got to protect the world's idiots from themselves. --Ediger On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Brian Riordan

Re: [Texascavers] Re: underground texting

2010-02-01 Thread John P Brooks
necessarily mean that I need to be rescued...but just to be SAFE and Avoid CONFUSION...it would be best that if there is NO TEXT from me; you should call out a rescue anyway. --- On Mon, 2/1/10, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote: From: Gill Edigar gi...@att.net Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: underground

[Texascavers] Re: underground texting

2010-01-31 Thread David
I found his science fair project fascinating. Back in 2004 or 2005, there was a post on Cavetex about beaming data from the bottom of a surface pit up to the base-camp.I think the article suggested that a new technology like Bluetooth would emerge.The idea didn't have any merit at that

Re: [Texascavers] Re: underground texting

2010-01-31 Thread Gill Edigar
I'm pretty sure that this is not a safe practice. I'm gonna write my congressman as soon as I'm through here and suggest that he initiate legislation banning texting whilst caving. --Ediger On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 2:06 PM, David dlocklea...@gmail.com wrote: I found his science fair project