Re: [Texascavers] Administrative Update #2

2007-03-26 Thread Bill Bentley
Better you than me! HAHAHAH! Just kidding Bill - Original Message - From: Charles wokka Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org To: texascavers@texascavers.com Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 4:06 PM Subject: [Texascavers] Administrative Update #2 Just a quick note to say that all seems

Re: [Texascavers] Administrative Update #2

2007-03-26 Thread Charles wokka Goldsmith
Message - From: Charles wokka Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org To: texascavers@texascavers.com Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 4:06 PM Subject: [Texascavers] Administrative Update #2 Just a quick note to say that all seems to be running smoothly. However, I've had a couple people contact me

Re: [Texascavers] Administrative Update #2

2007-03-26 Thread Bill Bentley
Your right But Dave Belski is subscribed from 2 different addresses... Bill - Original Message - From: Charles wokka Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org To: Bill Bentley cave...@cox.net Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 6:59 PM Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Administrative Update #2 Heh, so far

Re: [Texascavers] Administrative Update #2

2007-03-26 Thread Charles wokka Goldsmith
: Monday, February 27, 2006 6:59 PM Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Administrative Update #2 Heh, so far two people have mentioned double postings... either they have two addresses subscribed or something funky in their filter/rule setup. I know that you worked with one of them, Paul

Re: [Texascavers] Administrative Update #2

2007-03-26 Thread Bill Mixon
Charles -- Right now, texascavers messages come with the reply to field set to texascavers, which is why we're seeing things that ought to have been sent to the originator of a message, but instead went to everybody. Figure out how to make the reply to field echo the source of the message.

Re: [Texascavers] Administrative Update #2

2007-03-26 Thread Charles wokka Goldsmith
You are the second person to bring this to my attention. I've seen a couple of the duplicates as well, and I have no idea what's causing that, I can't find a source to it, but will continue to dig. I'll bring up the reply to with everyone in the group. Thanks Bill Mixon wrote: Charles --