>with -90/+90 have no effect too
With your example, true, I think, maybe.
But with this...
source
survey test
centerline
infer plumbs on
1 2 10 0 0
2 3 10 90 -90
3 4 10 0 0
4 5 20 150 0
5 6 10 270 90
equate 1 6
endcenterline
en
Two possible workflows for drawing map over xvi:
First:
1) integrate new centerline in whole cave (loops closed)
2) process whole cave and export xvi
3) draw over xvi
2) process map
Second:
1) process only new centerline and export xvi (no loops)
2) draw over xvi
3) integrate new centerline in w
08.03.2012 12:26, Olly Betts пиÑеÑ:
> Your example has no such clino readings, so enabling this option will
> have no effect.
with -90/+90 have no effect too
--
WBR, Vasily
Hello
Possible two workflow for drawing map over xvi:
First:
1) integrate new centerline in whole cave (loops closed)
2) process whole cave and export xvi
3) draw over xvi
2) process map
Second:
1) process only new centerline and export xvi (no loops)
2) draw over xvi
3) integrate new centerline
Hello
"infer plumbs on" not affected to vertical shot correction with loop closure
Example:
source
survey test
centerline
infer plumbs on
1 2 10 0 0
2 3 10 - down
3 4 10 0 0
4 5 20 150 0
5 6 10 - up
equate 1 6
endcenterline
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 11:35:18AM +0800, Vasily Vl. Suhachev wrote:
> "infer plumbs on" not affected to vertical shot correction with loop
> closure
[snip]
> infer plumbs on
>
> 1 2 10 0 0
> 2 3 10 - down
> 3 4 10 0 0
> 4 5 20 150 0
> 5 6 10 - up
"*infer pl