[Therion] Conflict between "extend ignore" command and inverse legs

? What do you think? Bruce From: Therion On Behalf Of Marco Corvi via Therion Sent: Thursday, 7 June 2018 11:29 PM To: therion@speleo.sk Cc: Marco Corvi Subject: Re: [Therion] Conflict between "extend ignore" command and inverse legs I have commented all the splays &quo

Re: [Therion] Conflict between "extend ignore" command and inverse legs

I have commented all the splays "extend ignore", and Therion is doing now a good job, ignoring the appropriate leg (extend ignore 83 92). All the splays "extend ignore" was confusing the Therion compiler. This data is an export from Topodroid, that incorporates the "extend ignore" command before

Re: [Therion] Conflict between "extend ignore" command and inverse legs

y legs? Bruce *From:*Therion *On Behalf Of *Evaristo Quiroga via Therion *Sent:* Thursday, 7 June 2018 5:40 AM *To:* therion@speleo.sk *Cc:* Evaristo Quiroga *Subject:* [Therion] Conflict between "extend ignore" command and inverse legs Hi, I usually do my surveys doing inverse measur

[Therion] Conflict between "extend ignore" command and inverse legs

nflict between "extend ignore" command and inverse legs Hi, I usually do my surveys doing inverse measures. I go ahead by positioning the points, and doing the measurements with the distoX2 looking back (inverse) and finally do the splay measurements at that destination point. My assista

[Therion] Conflict between "extend ignore" command and inverse legs

Hi, I usually do my surveys doing inverse measures. I go ahead by positioning the points, and doing the measurements with the distoX2 looking back (inverse) and finally do the splay measurements at that destination point. My assistant is in origin point, and don't have survey experience, is