On 20/06/2022 10:19, Bruce Mutton wrote:
> Ha! It was the great Tarquin who provided me with insight one year ago
> https://www.mail-archive.com/therion@speleo.sk/msg08109.html
"I have no memory of this place" Gandalf
But yes, what I am seeing now conflicts with what I wrote then. So
something
> As far as I am aware, the last called layout or statement always wins.
> Certainly since I started using the recipe I have not noticed any
> problems, and my layouts occasionally have conflicting parameters for a
> particular setting (which is why I originally had problems – I was not
> rigorous
Ha! It was the great Tarquin who provided me with insight one year ago
https://www.mail-archive.com/therion@speleo.sk/msg08109.html
___
Therion mailing list
Therion@speleo.sk
https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion
Hi Tarquin
I have occasionally had unexpected behaviours due to conflicting layout
calls, and came up with the recipe here for hierarchy and order of calls
some time ago
https://therion.speleo.sk/wiki/bds#order_of_layout_functions_called
As far as I am aware, the last called layout or
Hi folks,
I stumbled on something odd about the "copy" command, which is used in a
"layout". Normally, commands in a layout are interpreted in sequence, so
if you hide something with one command, then show it with a subsequent
command, it will use the second one, and show it:
symbol-hide point
