Re: [Thunar-dev] Experimental Thunar Trash tarball

2006-07-25 Thread Rodrigo Coacci
Post the relevant lines before the strptime declarations from time.h.BenediktHere they are:# ifdef __USE_XOPEN/* Parse S according to FORMAT and store binary time information in TP.   The return value is a pointer to the first unparsed character in S.  */ extern char *strptime (__const char *__res

Re: [Thunar-dev] Experimental Thunar Trash tarball

2006-07-25 Thread Benedikt Meurer
Stavros Giannouris wrote: >>>Meh, glibc. Try to add >>> >>>#ifndef _XOPEN_SOURCE >>>#define _XOPEN_SOURCE >>>#endif >>> >>>in thunar-file.c right before the line >>> >>>#include >>> >> >>Ok, this fixed the problem. > > > Didn't here. Build stopped with this error: > cc1: warnings being treated

Re: [Thunar-dev] Experimental Thunar Trash tarball

2006-07-25 Thread Stavros Giannouris
Στις Tue, 25 Jul 2006 20:16:34 + Ο/Η Laurent Meunier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> έγραψε: > Le Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:59:44 +0200, > Benedikt Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > > > > Meh, glibc. Try to add > > > > #ifndef _XOPEN_SOURCE > > #define _XOPEN_SOURCE > > #endif > > > > in thunar-file.

Re: [Thunar-dev] Experimental Thunar Trash tarball

2006-07-25 Thread Björn Martensen
Benedikt Meurer wrote: > Björn Martensen wrote: > thunar-file.c: In function ‘thunar_file_get_deletion_date’: > thunar-file.c:1361: warning: implicit declaration of function > ‘strptime’ > thunar-file.c:1361: warning: comparison between pointer and integer >>>

Re: [Thunar-dev] Experimental Thunar Trash tarball

2006-07-25 Thread Laurent Meunier
Le Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:59:44 +0200, Benedikt Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > Meh, glibc. Try to add > > #ifndef _XOPEN_SOURCE > #define _XOPEN_SOURCE > #endif > > in thunar-file.c right before the line > > #include > > > Björn > > Benedikt > Ok, this fixed the problem. I have the

Re: [Thunar-dev] Experimental Thunar Trash tarball

2006-07-25 Thread Björn Martensen
Benedikt Meurer wrote: > Björn Martensen wrote: >>> thunar-file.c: In function thunar_file_get_deletion_date: >>> thunar-file.c:1361: warning: implicit declaration of function >>> strptime >>> thunar-file.c:1361: warning: comparison between pointer and integer

Re: [Thunar-dev] Experimental Thunar Trash tarball

2006-07-25 Thread Benedikt Meurer
Björn Martensen wrote: >>thunar-file.c: In function thunar_file_get_deletion_date: >>thunar-file.c:1361: warning: implicit declaration of function >>strptime >>thunar-file.c:1361: warning: comparison between pointer and integer >>make[3]: *** [Thunar-thu

Re: [Thunar-dev] Experimental Thunar Trash tarball

2006-07-25 Thread Björn Martensen
Brian J. Tarricone wrote: > Benedikt Meurer wrote: >>> Björn Martensen wrote: > thunar-file.c: In function thunar_file_get_deletion_date: > thunar-file.c:1361: warning: implicit declaration of function > strptime > thunar-file.c:1361: warning: comparison betwee

Re: [Thunar-dev] Experimental Thunar Trash tarball

2006-07-25 Thread Benedikt Meurer
Björn Martensen wrote: thunar-file.c: In function ‘thunar_file_get_deletion_date’: thunar-file.c:1361: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘strptime’ thunar-file.c:1361: warning: comparison between pointer and integer make[3]: *** [Thunar-thunar-file.o] Error 1

Re: [Thunar-dev] Experimental Thunar Trash tarball

2006-07-25 Thread Brian J. Tarricone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Benedikt Meurer wrote: > Björn Martensen wrote: >>> thunar-file.c: In function ‘thunar_file_get_deletion_date’: >>> thunar-file.c:1361: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘strptime’ >>> thunar-file.c:1361: warning: comparison between

Re: [Thunar-dev] Experimental Thunar Trash tarball

2006-07-25 Thread Björn Martensen
Benedikt Meurer wrote: > Björn Martensen wrote: >>> thunar-file.c: In function ‘thunar_file_get_deletion_date’: >>> thunar-file.c:1361: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘strptime’ >>> thunar-file.c:1361: warning: comparison between pointer and integer >>> make[3]: *** [Thun

Re: [Thunar-dev] Experimental Thunar Trash tarball

2006-07-25 Thread Benedikt Meurer
Björn Martensen wrote: >>thunar-file.c: In function ‘thunar_file_get_deletion_date’: >>thunar-file.c:1361: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘strptime’ >>thunar-file.c:1361: warning: comparison between pointer and integer >>make[3]: *** [Thunar-thunar-file.o] Error 1 >>

Re: [Thunar-dev] Experimental Thunar Trash tarball

2006-07-25 Thread Björn Martensen
Benedikt Meurer wrote: > Björn Martensen wrote: I can't build the content of the tarball: > thunar-file.c: In function ‘thunar_file_get_deletion_date’: > thunar-file.c:1361: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘strptime’ > thunar-file.c:1361: warning: comparison between

Re: [Thunar-dev] Experimental Thunar Trash tarball

2006-07-25 Thread Benedikt Meurer
Björn Martensen wrote: >>>I can't build the content of the tarball: >>> thunar-file.c: In function ‘thunar_file_get_deletion_date’: thunar-file.c:1361: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘strptime’ thunar-file.c:1361: warning: comparison between pointer and integer make[3]: *

Re: [Thunar-dev] Experimental Thunar Trash tarball

2006-07-25 Thread Björn Martensen
Benedikt Meurer wrote: > Björn Martensen wrote: >> I can't build the content of the tarball: >> >>> thunar-file.c: In function ‘thunar_file_get_deletion_date’: >>> thunar-file.c:1361: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘strptime’ >>> thunar-file.c:1361: warning: comparison between pointer a

Re: [Thunar-dev] Experimental Thunar Trash tarball

2006-07-25 Thread Benedikt Meurer
Björn Martensen wrote: > I can't build the content of the tarball: > >>thunar-file.c: In function ‘thunar_file_get_deletion_date’: >>thunar-file.c:1361: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘strptime’ >>thunar-file.c:1361: warning: comparison between pointer and integer >>make[3]: *** [Thunar

Re: [Thunar-dev] Experimental Thunar Trash tarball

2006-07-25 Thread Björn Martensen
I can't build the content of the tarball: > thunar-file.c: In function ‘thunar_file_get_deletion_date’: > thunar-file.c:1361: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘strptime’ > thunar-file.c:1361: warning: comparison between pointer and integer > make[3]: *** [Thunar-thunar-file.o] Error 1 Bj

Re: [Thunar-dev] Experimental Thunar Trash tarball

2006-07-25 Thread Rodrigo Coacci
On 7/25/06, Benedikt Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Rodrigo Coacci wrote:> I guess those changes aren't in SVN, right?Yes. Just grab the tarball.Right, I'll see it when I get home.-- Cheers,  Rodrigo ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org

Re: [Thunar-dev] Experimental Thunar Trash tarball

2006-07-25 Thread Benedikt Meurer
Rodrigo Coacci wrote: > I guess those changes aren't in SVN, right? Yes. Just grab the tarball. Benedikt ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev

Re: [Thunar-dev] Experimental Thunar Trash tarball

2006-07-25 Thread Rodrigo Coacci
I guess those changes aren't in SVN, right?On 7/25/06, Benedikt Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:The import of the trash framework into Thunar is mostly finished, and works for my tests. It's currently limited to the home trash, but willbe extended to utilize foreign trash dirs as well.I've upload

[Thunar-dev] Experimental Thunar Trash tarball

2006-07-25 Thread Benedikt Meurer
The import of the trash framework into Thunar is mostly finished, and works for my tests. It's currently limited to the home trash, but will be extended to utilize foreign trash dirs as well. I've uploaded an experimental tarball at: http://thunar.xfce.org/download/snapshots/devel/Thunar-0.3.3svn-

Re: [Thunar-dev] tree-error with pango

2006-07-25 Thread Benedikt Meurer
Benedikt Meurer wrote: >>I ran a xunar-binary and a selfcompiled Thunar-0.3.3svn-r22506When I >>open the tree in the sidepane, Thunar crashes right after the tree >>expanded. > > The stack traces seem to be corrupted. You could try to build Thunar > with --enable-debug=full, that should produce be

Re: [Thunar-dev] Thunar-dev Digest, Vol 18, Issue 24

2006-07-25 Thread Benedikt Meurer
Mark Ulrich wrote: > Now the error looks different (--enable-debug=full), but I recompiled some > libraries. > I will not investigate further, as we decided to use Gtk 2.8 in Puppylinux > for a while. > Thanks for your help. > I add the latest gdb -results. > > Program received signal SIGSEGV,