Re: [tw] Re: [TW5] WebDav Saver Observations.

2017-08-29 Thread Arlen Beiler
And can you reload the renamed file and continue saving to it? Or not? On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 7:59 PM, Lost Admin wrote: > When I created a wiki with a space in the filename and used the webdav > saver, it replaced the space with the URL encoding (%20) in the filename

[tw] Suggestions for future features

2017-08-29 Thread Kathir J
Having tags for each document (Reference: https://collatenotes.com/) Built in web clipper (save webpages locally) - (Reference: https://collatenotes.com/) Import data from Zim Wiki or Text files - (Reference: https://collatenotes.com/) Google like search like ambar cloud (Reference:

Re: [tw] Re: [TW5] WebDav Saver Observations.

2017-08-29 Thread Lost Admin
When I created a wiki with a space in the filename and used the webdav saver, it replaced the space with the URL encoding (%20) in the filename on save. This was tested using my Apache setup from Safari on iOS. Haven't tested other browsers but I doubt they will be any different. -- You

[tw] Re: [TW5]Dynamic values in Default Tiddler settings

2017-08-29 Thread TonyM
Joshua, While you await an answer, I just thought I would point out that once you achieve what you ask, if the current journal entry does not exist, you will have a new tiddler open with no content. That would be OK except we often want such new journal entries to have particular tags etc...

[tw] Re: [TW5] timeline macro & days filter - I don't get it.

2017-08-29 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
The "days" operator was added at version 5.1.10. Good luck, Mark On Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 4:41:35 AM UTC-7, Stephan Hradek wrote: > > Could it be my TiddlyWiki is too old? 5.1.9. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To

[tw] Re: [TW5] timeline macro & days filter - I don't get it.

2017-08-29 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
Maybe drag some of your tiddlers and your timeline macro into tiddlywiki.com and see how it displays. Mark On Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 4:41:35 AM UTC-7, Stephan Hradek wrote: > > Could it be my TiddlyWiki is too old? 5.1.9. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[tw] [TW5]Dynamic values in Default Tiddler settings

2017-08-29 Thread Joshua Stubbs
I would like to set TiddlyWiki to always open my current journal entry by default, so in settings under Default Tiddlers, I added this: [{ThisMonth}] with ThisMonth being a tiddler containing: <> But this makes the default list contain a tiddler litterally named the contents of ThisMonth

Re: [tw] Re: Fountain Parser for a screenwriting tool

2017-08-29 Thread RichardWilliamSmith
Hi Jan, I'll just echo what Josiah has said and say that I think you can actually do a better job with tiddlywiki than you could with that library, just because Tiddlywiki already has mechanisms for handling lots of tiny bits of content, knowing what order to put them in and knowing what kind

Re: [tw] Re: Best "equal" operator?

2017-08-29 Thread Thomas Elmiger
Argh – why do I keep forgetting such elementary tricks? Thank you, Eric! 2017-08-29 8:46 GMT+02:00 Eric Shulman : > On Monday, August 28, 2017 at 11:41:05 PM UTC-7, Thomas Elmiger wrote: >> >> In my tests for the macro linked above I compared the reveal-way (it was >>

[tw] Re: [TW5] timeline macro & days filter - I don't get it.

2017-08-29 Thread Stephan Hradek
Could it be my TiddlyWiki is too old? 5.1.9. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send

[tw] [TW5] timeline macro & days filter - I don't get it.

2017-08-29 Thread Stephan Hradek
Can someone please enlighten me about how to use the timeline macro properly? I understood that [!days:modified[-14]] would give me all tiddlers modified more than 14 days ago should be selected. So I used <> but get results from today and also 8 days ago. Is my understanding wrong? --

[tw] Re: Dynamic Filters

2017-08-29 Thread Stobot
Thanks all. These help a lot and I'll try them all! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this

Re: [tw] Re: Fountain Parser for a screenwriting tool

2017-08-29 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Ciao Jan I looked more closely at Fountain Syntax. It might be possible, I think, to do a reduced, but still effective, simpler subset in a TW markup. Its basically using regular expressions. The Fountain *forced* syntax is very simple. Lines starting with special characters get converted in

Re: [tw] Re: Best "equal" operator?

2017-08-29 Thread Eric Shulman
On Monday, August 28, 2017 at 11:41:05 PM UTC-7, Thomas Elmiger wrote: > > In my tests for the macro linked above I compared the reveal-way (it was > suitable for my case). I decided to not use reveal because of the > limitation of the reveal widget: You can’t use variables for both sides of >

Re: [tw] Re: Best "equal" operator?

2017-08-29 Thread Thomas Elmiger
In my tests for the macro linked above I compared the reveal-way (it was suitable for my case). I decided to not use reveal because of the limitation of the reveal widget: You can’t use variables for both sides of the comparison. One – and users would have to know which one – would have to be a

Re: [tw] Re: Best "equal" operator?

2017-08-29 Thread Stephan Hradek
Am Montag, 28. August 2017 23:44:51 UTC+2 schrieb Thomas Elmiger: > > > @Stephan, do you suggest it would be better to use the reveal widget? > > No, I'm just wondering whether it might work. I'm yet to completely understand the use case. -- You received this message because you are