Re: [tw] Feedback for TiddlyClip

let me know how it goes, like I said I have made a small improvement for the next release (which I am currently testing by using it for a couple of weeks). I usually use it with firefox so feedback about the chrome version is very helpful. On 14 February 2016 at 19:34, Alex Hough

Re: [tw] Feedback for TiddlyClip

if you'd like me to test on node.js and chrome I'd be very happy to Like some others on the group I am starting a project to write a paper for a conference. I've revisited my reference manager of choice (Zotero) to find that the Chrome addon doesn't work very well. My thinking i that I will

Re: [tw] Feedback for TiddlyClip

Thanks BJ, I think its one of those TW vortices where you come back to it in a few days time and you can't understand why you *couldn't* get it to work. I'll try again best Alex On 14 February 2016 at 14:13, BJ wrote: > HI Alex, > tiddlyclip does work with chrome (see my

Re: [tw] Feedback for TiddlyClip

BJ, My current understanding is that TiddlyClip doesn't work with Chrome... am I right. As a feature request, i would like to use it with node.js Alex On 1 February 2016 at 20:48, Marc Ferguson wrote: > Thanks. You are the best. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Feb 1,

Re: [tw] Feedback for TiddlyClip

HI Alex, tiddlyclip does work with chrome (see my answer to Matabele above), and tiddlyclip works with node.js tiddlywikis. I am making some small improvements to the context menu for the next release. all the best BJ On Sunday, February 14, 2016 at 12:14:23 PM UTC, AlexHough wrote: > > BJ, >

Re: [tw] Feedback for TiddlyClip

Hi Marc, recently ff has made it such that all addons need signing, there is a signed version of tiddlyclip here: https://github.com/buggyj/tiddlyclip/blob/master/tiddlyclip-0.0.9-fx%2Ban.xpi click on the 'raw' button and down the file, then drag and drop it onto the ff addons window. all

Re: [tw] Feedback for TiddlyClip

Thanks. You are the best. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:16 PM, BJ wrote: > > Hi Marc, > recently ff has made it such that all addons need signing, there is a signed > version of tiddlyclip here: > >

Re: [tw] Feedback for TiddlyClip

Hi Pit.W, sorry for the delayed response and thank very much for the feedback. On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 5:21:30 PM UTC, Pit.W. wrote: > > Hi BJ! > > How kind of You to ask such a question! Wishlist for Santa: > > 1. The context menu might benefit from longer and more detailed

Re: [tw] Feedback for TiddlyClip

I can't get twiddly clip to work on a Mac with ff. It says that the add on is not verified. Don't know what I am doing wrong. Looking forward to using this. Thanks Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 1, 2016, at 4:48 AM, BJ wrote: > > > Hi Pit.W, > sorry for the delayed

Re: [tw] Feedback for TiddlyClip

Hi BJ, Great, thank you! One more question: I created a new rule so that I can have both defaultSnip and ReaderViewSnip. both seem to work but I was wondering if the fact that I replaced the shadow tiddler $:/plugins/bj/tiddlyclip/sublink.jswith a custom version is the correct way to

Re: [tw] Feedback for TiddlyClip

btw for anyone else who uses firefox reader view, the content of the JS tiddler should be the following: (in order to also strip the prefix "about:reader?url=") |exports.name ="decodeuri"; exports.run = function(uri) { return decodeURIComponent(uri.slice(17)); }| On 28/01/16 20:46, BJ

Re: [tw] Feedback for TiddlyClip

Hi BJ, First thank you for your plugin, it's so useful to me! I use it to collect news articles, so that I can later search by keyword and find the source. I would only have one small feature request: I sometimes use the "reader view" option in firefox

Re: [tw] Feedback for TiddlyClip

Hi Erwan, it is possible to do what you want with the present tiddlyclip. Your uri has been encode, and so needs to be decoded. This can be achieved by adding a new tiddlyclip macro. The easiest way to do this is to clone an existing one, so clone $:/plugins/bj/tiddlyclip/sublink.js, and

[tw] Feedback for TiddlyClip

Hi all, I am working on necessary changes to tiddlyclip in order support future versions of firefox. As a am current focused on tiddlyclip, this would be a good time to let me know of anything that you think could be improved or added to tiddlyclip or its documentation, or maybe you have a

Re: [tw] Feedback for TiddlyClip

Hi BJ! How kind of You to ask such a question! Wishlist for Santa: 1. The context menu might benefit from longer and more detailed tootips, explaining snip, snap... 2. For me tiddlyclip only works, if the source and the destination TW are in the same window (in different tabs). Would it