Re: [tw] IE10 and Code View

2013-03-01 Thread Jeremy Ruston
I've created an issue for the problem: https://github.com/TiddlyWiki/tiddlywiki/issues/118 Best wishes Jeremy On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Jeremy Ruston jeremy.rus...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Tobias Good catch, thank you very much for that. I'll explore a proper fix as soon as I can,

Re: [tw] IE10 and Code View

2013-02-26 Thread Jeremy Ruston
Hi Tobias Good catch, thank you very much for that. I'll explore a proper fix as soon as I can, Best wishes Jeremy On Sunday, 24 February 2013, Tobias Beer wrote: Ho again Scott, The problematic code seems to be this... enclosedTextHelper: function(w) { this.lookaheadRegExp.lastIndex =

Re: [tw] IE10 and Code View

2013-02-24 Thread Scott Simmons
Lookit you! I doubt it would ever have occurred to me to go looking for something like that. I guess IE is abandoning \r in favor of \n — but why on Earth no preserve backward-compability with their own parsing preference? (Unless they've been preserving it for a couple of versions already

Re: [tw] IE10 and Code View

2013-02-23 Thread Scott Simmons
On Friday, February 22, 2013 3:52:42 PM UTC-5, Tobias Beer wrote: I just noticed something really funny... 1) Open the page in IE 10 desktop mode 2) Turn on the developer pane by hitting F12 3) click edit button in the HTML view toolbar 4) click it again withouth actually editing anything

Re: [tw] IE10 and Code View

2013-02-23 Thread Tobias Beer
Ho again Scott, The problematic code seems to be this... enclosedTextHelper: function(w) { this.lookaheadRegExp.lastIndex = w.matchStart; var lookaheadMatch = this.lookaheadRegExp.exec(w.source); if(lookaheadMatch lookaheadMatch.index == w.matchStart) { var text = lookaheadMatch[1]; *

Re: [tw] IE10 and Code View

2013-02-22 Thread Tobias Beer
Hi Scott Jeremy, I just noticed something really funny... 1) Open the page in IE 10 desktop mode 2) Turn on the developer pane by hitting F12 3) click edit button in the HTML view toolbar 4) click it again withouth actually editing anything 5) now the linebreaks are displayed correctly What's

Re: [tw] IE10 and Code View

2013-02-22 Thread Tobias Beer
By the way, Scott, you probably already know... you can change the ie rendering mode to another version also for local files within the developer tools; top-right in the menu. Cheers, Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To

Re: [tw] IE10 and Code View

2013-02-21 Thread Scott Simmons
Thanks for the responses! On Tuesday, February 19, 2013 7:08:05 AM UTC-5, Jeremy Ruston wrote: visible difference between the two versions can be attributed to the HTTP version being read only. Do you get the same behaviour if you visit your site over HTTP with #readOnly:no at the end of the

Re: [tw] IE10 and Code View

2013-02-19 Thread Jeremy Ruston
Hi Scott The different behaviour you're seeing when viewing over http vs. a file URI is indeed very puzzling. Studying the screenshots, the other visible difference between the two versions can be attributed to the HTTP version being read only. Do you get the same behaviour if you visit your site

Re: [tw] IE10 and Code View

2013-02-19 Thread Jeremy Ruston
Thanks Tobias, good catch, patches much appreciated. Best wishes Jeremy On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Tobias Beer beertob...@gmail.com wrote: There is a bug in TiddlyWiki that may make it fail for ie10, e.g. the ImageMacroPlugin, on which a few others depend on TiddlySpace: ieVersion

Re: [tw] IE10 and Code View

2013-02-19 Thread Jeremy Ruston
Hi Scott I've had a quick look at your page in IE10, and am experiencing the same missing line breaks problem, even though I'm viewing the page over HTTP. I did find out that if you open the developer tools in IE with F10, and then switch the Document Mode: Standards dropdown to IE9 mode, then

Re: [tw] IE10 and Code View

2013-02-16 Thread Tobias Beer
There is a bug in TiddlyWiki that may make it fail for ie10, e.g. the ImageMacroPlugin, on which a few others depend on TiddlySpace: ieVersion is not assessed correctly as it doesn't (yet) cater for any version 9 as it only looks for a single digit. Was about to fork the master and and

Re: [tw] IE10 and Code View

2013-02-15 Thread Scott Simmons
Hi, Jeremy — Sorry for disappearing for two weeks. I wanted to double-check on a different machine and confirm that it stayed consistent — and then got distracted by something shiny ... . Here's what I can report: - The display quirk occurs on at least one other Windows 8 machine

Re: [tw] IE10 and Code View

2013-01-29 Thread Jeremy Ruston
Hi Scott I've not heard of this affecting TW on IE10. It sounds as though the CSS for the pre element has been messed up to lose the white-space: pre setting. Are you using any non-standard CSS? Best wishes Jeremy On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Scott Simmons goo...@secret-hq.comwrote:

Re: [tw] IE10 and Code View

2013-01-29 Thread Scott Simmons
I've not heard of this affecting TW on IE10. It sounds as though the CSS for the pre element has been messed up to lose the white-space: pre setting. Are you using any non-standard CSS? I HAVE been playing around with my StyleSheet lately, but I first noticed this on a bare-bones TW that

Re: [tw] IE10 and Code View

2013-01-29 Thread Scott Simmons
I forgot to mention that it's not just IE10 that's new for my TWs; I'm also editing them on Windows 8 for the first time. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

Re: [tw] IE10 and Code View

2013-01-29 Thread Jeremy Ruston
Hi Scott Just to be clear, do you get the problem when you view a tiddler on tiddlywiki.com that contains monospaced formatting: http://tiddlywiki.com/#ExamplePlugin Or do you have to have editted the TiddlyWiki file on Windows 8 in order to see the problem? Best wishes Jeremy On Tue, Jan

[tw] IE10 and Code View

2013-01-28 Thread Scott Simmons
I just started using IE10's engine to edit and save TWs and noticed that hard returns inside long blocks of code set off by braces are ignored when rendering tiddlers. The effect is that {{{ code like this block }}} is rendered as if it were {{{ codelike thisblock }}} Anyone else noticed