Re: [tw] Re: [TW5] Nesting of Items in Ordered Lists

2016-04-30 Thread Scott Simmons (Secret-HQ)
On Saturday, April 30, 2016 at 5:21:01 PM UTC-4, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > Any reason that styling was deliberately left out of TW5? > > It’s more that it’s the default HTML/CSS styling; TW5 doesn’t generally > change defaults unless it’s functionally necessary. > Thanks! I wasn't sure if it was

Re: [tw] Re: [TW5] Nesting of Items in Ordered Lists

2016-04-30 Thread Jeremy Ruston
Hi Scott > Any reason that styling was deliberately left out of TW5? It’s more that it’s the default HTML/CSS styling; TW5 doesn’t generally change defaults unless it’s functionally necessary. Best wishes Jeremy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[tw] Re: [TW5] Nesting of Items in Ordered Lists

2016-04-30 Thread Scott Simmons (Secret-HQ)
Well, that's gloriously simple. Thanks, Eric! Any reason that styling was deliberately left out of TW5? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[tw] Re: [TW5] Nesting of Items in Ordered Lists

2016-04-29 Thread Eric Shulman
On Friday, April 29, 2016 at 12:05:56 PM UTC-7, Scott Simmons (Secret-HQ) wrote: > > Hmmm. Does TW5 no longer support nested ordered lists, like TWC did? > > For example, this: > > #first item > ##second item > ###third item > > ... renders in TWC as: > > 1. first item >a. second item >