...thanks even more so for the advice...obviously Ill play around with
a simple non-importante test TW first!!!
and thanks for the warning/advice
Skye
On 15 dez, 12:36, rakugo wrote:
> I should also say take care when hijacking where you don't completely
> know what you are doing. If you do it
I should also say take care when hijacking where you don't completely
know what you are doing. If you do it wrong you could break the
function. In this situation that means it would be impossible to save
any tiddlers... so take backups :)
On Dec 15, 1:47 am, skye riquelme wrote:
> Ooopa..now
Ooopa..now thats exactly what I wanted to know. now to work to
see if I can get it woring as I want.
Thanks
Skye
On 14 dez, 08:18, rakugo wrote:
> Hijack does seem to be the right word. The idea with hijacking is
>
> // cache the old value of the function
> var _cache = TiddlyWiki.prot
Hijack does seem to be the right word. The idea with hijacking is
// cache the old value of the function
var _cache = TiddlyWiki.prototype.saveTiddler;
// override the existing value
TiddlyWiki.prototype.saveTiddler =
function(title,newTitle,newBody,modifier,modified,tags,fields,clearChangeCount,c
4 matches
Mail list logo