[tw] Re: How do you use the core filter macro?

2009-07-05 Thread FND
I think a feature like filtering should be included on TiddlyWiki.com [...] The TW community has no control over TiddlyWiki.com, and can only make suggestions. See these recent messages (sadly buried in an largely unrelated thread):

[tw] Re: How do you use the core filter macro?

2009-06-29 Thread FND
Its not clear form TW.org or your post that the filter syntax has to be used in a list or DefaultTiddlers. Reading your documentation for matchTags[1] explains the built in function though. It would be good if core functions were documented like this. I agree that would be useful. That's

[tw] Re: How do you use the core filter macro?

2009-06-29 Thread Alex Hough
I think a feature like filtering should be included on TiddlyWiki.com if it is a feature that has been included in the core. It would best belong with content on lists. To my mind it would naturally belong on under the content section of the features Tiddler[1] I think it would be better for TW

[tw] Re: How do you use the core filter macro?

2009-06-26 Thread alex
Hi Eric, I'd read your previous post and looked at it for a long time. I made a test case.It seems that the filter only works in DefaultTiddlers or a list. Its not clear form TW.org or your post that the filter syntax has to be used in a list or DefaultTiddlers. Reading your documentation for

[tw] Re: How do you use the core filter macro?

2009-06-26 Thread Alex Hough
In the last post [2] should have been [2] https://files.getdropbox.com/u/1316865/Tests.html --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To post to this group, send email to

[tw] Re: How do you use the core filter macro?

2009-06-25 Thread Eric Shulman
On Jun 25, 9:32 am, Alex Hough r.a.ho...@googlemail.com wrote: The external resources on tw.org [1] are not clear to me. However, I am thinking that using this built in function would be better than some plugin solutions. This would reduce 'plugin dependency' which i am now convinced is not