On Jun 21, 9:49 am, FND f...@gmx.net wrote:
What's the status of tinytiddly?
I was under the impression the the TinyTiddly build mechanism was now
largely automated, so it should in theory be up to date.
It might just be an oversight - will investigate and report back here.
A good
I understand the point. Distribution and portability are easier with
embedded code. However, TW 2.5.0 already includes the separate file
TiddlySaver.jar, so complete portability involves copying two files.
With a separate jQuery directory, one could keep the old version of
jQuery and still try a
What's the status of tinytiddly?
I was under the impression the the TinyTiddly build mechanism was now
largely automated, so it should in theory be up to date.
It might just be an oversight - will investigate and report back here.
A good compromise might be having two versions of TW, one
On Jun 20, 7:46 pm, Swampy ma...@uri.edu wrote:
2. TW 2.5.0 includes jQuery. However, jQuery is usually loaded from a
separate file [3], but the HTML file for TW 2.5.0 has jQuery embedded.
Is this the complete jQuery? Why embed it instead of keeping it a
separate file (so that one can
4 matches
Mail list logo
