Re: [tw] TW5 and its style

2012-04-13 Thread Steve Rutter
RE: Styling Oh, ok. That makes sense. I guess you are considering targeting mobile platforms, as well. That's a good idea. RE: Built-in Editing Yeah, that is what I was talking about. RE: Node.js Let me see if I understand what Node.js does. It's a javascript that still runs under the browser,

Re: [tw] TW5 and its style

2012-04-13 Thread wolfgang
I must say I love it at first sight :-) It goes straight in the direction which I tried to get at by adapting Tryptych tiddlyspace for standalone use: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/241006/Triptych_2.6.4.html I'm confident TW5 will be even much more versatile than the current, so that any disliked

[tw] TW5 and its style

2012-04-12 Thread Steve Rutter
Question about TW5. Is it going to be pushed to the public in its current style? I really don't like it, having that pop-up, scrolling, menu on the side. I was hoping TW5 would look similar to the current TW, but be much better on the back side and have that built-in editing present. Is there any

Re: [tw] TW5 and its style

2012-04-12 Thread Jeremy Ruston
Question about TW5. Is it going to be pushed to the public in its current style? No. Intentionally, I've paid little attention to the appearance up until now, focusing instead on getting the mechanisms right that generate and refresh HTML. I've done enough styling to let me test it, but no more.