Josiah et al,
On further reflection tiddlywiki is already a unique and somewhat indestinct
name and exists in great numbers in search engines. Just what we need, and
already have.
Perhaps instead we need to place keywords around it such as;
Tiddlywiki platform
Applications on tiddlywiki
Tiddlyw
We have the TWechnology, we can make stuff TWetter than it was. Twetter,
stronger, faster.
>From the 6 Million Dollar Tiddlywiki.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
Ciao Jeremy
Footnote to last.
The only issue I can see with "Tiddly" is it can evoke "diminutive" with
possible semantic resonance of "under-powered / featured" (which it
definitely isn't, rather the opposite). But, TBH, I'm not sure non-British
speakers would have that possible chain of mean
Ciao Jeremy
Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
> The obvious characteristic of a wiki is that anyone can edit it.
>
Yeah. But that applies to a vast realm of stuff that are not thought of as
"wikis" at all. I mean, a lot of better WordPress elaborations do that. And
include markup systems & so on.
> H
Hi Josiah
> By way of background the question ...
>
> Please explain to me why TiddlyWiki is seen as a "Wiki"?
>
> 1 - It seems to be VERY different to other "Wiki" systems in its fundamental
> workings & potential.
The obvious characteristic of a wiki is that anyone can edit it. However, I’v
By way of background the question ...
*Please explain to me why TiddlyWiki is seen as a "Wiki"?*
1 - It seems to be VERY different to other "Wiki" systems in its
fundamental workings & potential.
2 - So, is it helpful to describe it as a Wiki, now?
3 - I always have trouble explaining what is
6 matches
Mail list logo
