[tw5] Re: "type" filter operator missing from official list?

Just like with regular fields you can use the has and get operators then filter the result such as has[type]prefix[text] regards Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

[tw5] Re: "type" filter operator missing from official list?

A. Gloom > tiddlers with no type set? ... > so what does the field operator [type[]] produce? I believe they are: *text/vnd.tiddlywiki *? TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

[tw5] Re: "type" filter operator missing from official list?

ty Mark & Tony, I forgot about the automatic field operator assumption so what does the field operator [type[]] produce? tiddlers with no type set? Most of my tiddlers that don't have a type set display their type application/x-tiddler (not in Tiddler Info>Advanced>Fields which reads type

[tw5] Re: "type" filter operator missing from official list?

A, Mark beat me too it The reason is there is not special operator. since type is a field name you are effectively using a version of the Field Operator This is actually a nice option because to can say fieldname[value] which in a way allows you to

[tw5] Re: "type" filter operator missing from official list?

"type" isn't a filter operator -- it's a field. >From the docs for the field operator: The syntax of a filter step treats > any unrecognised filter operator > as if it was the suffix to > the field operator.