Re: [tw5] Re: [Request] New here but without parent's tags

2020-11-30 Thread TW Tones
Chris, The best way to learn can be to teach :) Tones On Tuesday, 1 December 2020 at 02:10:15 UTC+11 clutterstack wrote: > David, it's great to hear that it works for you. You're very welcome. Your > TW contributions have informed and inspired me for many years! I was also > pleased finally

Re: [tw5] Re: [Request] New here but without parent's tags

2020-11-30 Thread clutterstack
David, it's great to hear that it works for you. You're very welcome. Your TW contributions have informed and inspired me for many years! I was also pleased finally to be able to offer a working answer to someone's question on here, even if I don't have the confidence to say it's the best way.

Re: [tw5] Re: [Request] New here but without parent's tags

2020-11-30 Thread David Gifford
Hi clutterstack I tried it, but...no, no buts, it worked like a charm! Thanks a bunch! On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 8:43 PM clutterstack wrote: > OK, how about this for the button actions? Usual disclaimers about backing > up data! > > \define newHereActions() > <$set name="tags" filter="[] > [{$:

Re: [tw5] Re: [Request] New here but without parent's tags

2020-11-30 Thread David Gifford
clutterstack, I would like to try this out, but it looks like everything is inside the define / end. Is there a button I have to put after the /end? Or does the /end need to move up somewhere? On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 8:43 PM clutterstack wrote: > OK, how about this for the button actions? Usual

[tw5] Re: [Request] New here but without parent's tags

2020-11-29 Thread Eric Shulman
On Sunday, November 29, 2020 at 6:26:04 PM UTC-8 TW Tones wrote: > When creating the new tiddler you have the parameter tags=<> so no > wonder it inherits the tags. > Perhaps change it to tags=<> ? > The value of <> doesn't come from the current tiddler. His code constructs the desired tags

[tw5] Re: [Request] New here but without parent's tags

2020-11-29 Thread TW Tones
David, When creating the new tiddler you have the parameter tags=<> so no wonder it inherits the tags. Perhaps change it to tags=<> ? Tones On Sunday, 29 November 2020 at 01:36:11 UTC+11 David Gifford wrote: > Hi everyone! > > Below is the snippet for my "New tab here" button. It creates a

[tw5] Re: [Request] New here but without parent's tags

2020-11-28 Thread clutterstack
OK, how about this for the button actions? Usual disclaimers about backing up data! \define newHereActions() <$set name="tags" filter="[] [{$:/config/NewTiddler/Tags!!tags}]"> <$action-createtiddler $basetitle=<> $savetitle=!!latestHere tags=<> text="* " caption="" meta="note"/><$action-navig

[tw5] Re: [Request] New here but without parent's tags

2020-11-28 Thread clutterstack
...action-createtiddler, tm-navigate message, and then tm-edit-tiddler? I'm curious to see the "right" answer to this. :) On Saturday, November 28, 2020 at 4:20:59 PM UTC-5 clutterstack wrote: > Now I'm trying that, and wondering if it might be easier to create the > tiddler the way you did, an

[tw5] Re: [Request] New here but without parent's tags

2020-11-28 Thread clutterstack
Now I'm trying that, and wondering if it might be easier to create the tiddler the way you did, and then just remove the superfluous tags with action-listops... But many others here would know off the bat the best way to increment the title; I'd have to look into it. Best, Chris On Saturday,

[tw5] Re: [Request] New here but without parent's tags

2020-11-28 Thread clutterstack
Hi David, Looks like you are using the tm-new-tiddler message using the original tiddler as a template ("$param"), and need to change it to use a title parameter instead: https://tiddlywiki.com/#WidgetMessage%3A%20tm-new-tiddler Best, Chris On Saturday, November 28, 2020 at 9:36:11 AM UTC-5 Dav