I'm not a JavaScript programmer but it's possible in TW to get quite raw
with it to good effect sometimes. But it's mainly limited to the pre-parser
you get that freedom. I really like and use a lot BJ's Flexity plugin that
let's me use standard JS regular expressions in TW without the
>
> I think this is a bug I stumbled upon previously. Is java script free of
> bugs?
>
Javascript gets pounded on by millions (billions?) of users every day. In
the vein of "Gödel, Escher, Bach", there's bound to be some bugs in there.
The question is, how long does it take before you
Mark,
I think this is a bug I stumbled upon previously. Is java script free of
bugs?
As someone who is yet to learn java-script properly, it is the shortest
path for me to use wikitext.
But how would you reproduce the list filter structure of tiddlywiki in
javascript, I expect it could be
Jed,
Thanks for the suggestions, I have worked through the code and there are
little or no opportunities for a break to sneak in to the code. But I will
review it with fresh eyes, I will also see if I can make a macro that
removes the spaces because I am not keen to add more complexity into
Undocumented, secret-handshake structures is another reason why I would
prefer to code in javascript.
-- Mark
On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 3:22:31 AM UTC-7, Jed Carty wrote:
>
> I think that normally comes from line breaks in your code that normally
> shouldn't do anything. Something like
>
>
I think that normally comes from line breaks in your code that normally
shouldn't do anything. Something like
<$list filter=blah>
<$reveal blah blah blah>
something
may give some extra whitespace that you can sometimes remove by doing this:
<$list filter=blah><$reveal blah blah blah>
6 matches
Mail list logo
