I've been playing around with TW and I have some ideas for niche
applications. However I need to learn js to tie pieces together.
Given my relative naivete with html/js, my question is how to protect
the content? Can an app or app functions of a TW be compiled? Are
there other ways to encrypt
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 7:15 AM, bwallum r...@btconnect.com wrote:
Hi
I'm trying to open a long list of tiddlers from a table. I can do this
but it displays at the bottom of the list.
How can I set the table to display at the top of the list please?
I don't quite follow. I think you're
Given my relative naivete with html/js, my question is how to protect
the content? Can an app or app functions of a TW be compiled? Are
there other ways to encrypt html/js source code? If there aren't,
then I suppose I won't try.
There are ways to compress/obfuscate JavaScript code - but
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 12:01 AM, SteveM sbma...@comcast.net wrote:
I've been playing around with TW and I have some ideas for niche
applications. However I need to learn js to tie pieces together.
Given my relative naivete with html/js, my question is how to protect
the content? Can an
Whilst trying a nice plugin from FND today I noticed that all my MPTW
Plugins where quite outdated. As I've probably added them to my (d3)TW
at 2.1 version times I thought to make it propper and removed all MPTW
Plugins first. Well the only reason I've got MPTW stuff installed is
that I really
Given my relative naivete with html/js, my question is how to protect
the content? Can an app or app functions of a TW be compiled? Are
there other ways to encrypt html/js source code?
Keep in mind that TW was built as an open source project, and the
ability to create a 'closed source'
To Both,
Thanks for your replies. I understand what you are saying. You look
at TW as a labor of love. And I really appreciate the great work that
Jeremy and all of the plug-in developers have done.
My take on it is more pragmatic. Apps get developed when there's
money in it. It seems like
You look at TW as a labor of love.
[...]
Apps get developed when there's money in it. It seems like a tension
exists in the open-source community because profit is made to be a
bad thing.
That's not correct. While there are some people in the FOSS community
who regard making money as
Thanks for the response.
It's probably best explained by showing you the problem.
The TW is at
http://www.ettrickvillagehall.org/CommunitySurvey2008.html
If you select Results Part One from the MainMenu you are presented with
a table of topics, each topic has a link which gathers together all
I think that what others have suggested is that they understand that
it would lead to a healthier and longer lasting relationship with your
customer if you sell him (and charge accordingly) the template and the
freedom to use the template however they want (that would probably
include buying
Re: Social engineering. Well you guys are demonizing me for what
appears to be a pretty legitimate question and line of inquiry.
I did not mean to imply that there's anything 'demonic' about either
you or your question... there is, however, a distinctly different
economic model for
If you wish to exploit others efforts for your own personal gain then
that is a matter for your conscience.
We all do that. I use Firefox for my own personal gain. And, while at
work, lots of other open source software for my own financial gain.
Pretending that open source derived software is
Lastly, and this time I mean it...
I agree conceptually with the open source paradigm. But software has
a way of migrating pretty easily into the torrent-o-sphere regardless
of the intent of the original owner. I dunno, I have to think about
that one...
I am a radical pragmatist and open
It was probably this bit that was the clue...
I mean if I develop a VBA app for Excel for a customer, I compile it
into an Add-In to protect my IP.
A different technology and different commercial perspective with rights
to exploit I agree, but I suggest open source comes from a different
probably involve somebody making money but the open source model
prevents that.
The open source model doesn't prevent 'making money'... it just
separates the 'value proposition' from the deliverables... you get
paid for the value of your expertise, skills, and efforts, rather than
for the
On Jan 9, 11:45 pm, Jon jevis...@noctrl.edu wrote:
...Now if they'll just put it on a PDA that's not a @#$%*! phone!
I agree
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
TiddlyWiki group.
To post to this group,
Stop Me Before I Reply Again!
Eric, your insights match the creativity of your work.
Back to radical pragmatism. Moodle is a great product. And the
Plugin library is extensive and broken. Someone could swoop in and
validate what works, repair what is broken and augment as needed. But
no one
Steve, you seem to be somewhat unclear about open source and its
implications (which I don't blame you for, because it's not something to
be taken for granted - though that's slowly changing).
It's really worth learning about FOSS - both from an intellectual and
from an economic perspective.
...Now if they'll just put it on a PDA that's not a @#$%*! phone!
--Jon
I also agree. I miss the PDA devices, and so far I have not been able
to get my old ones to sync with Linux which limits their functionality
for me. I also don't want one that is on an expensive phone. I use a
Tracfone
SteveM.
Re: you increase exposure to risk in not taking a risk so it might
be worth taking the risk - It could well be a Abbot and Costello
line, but the Mr Adams who gives the law in question it name is Denis
Adams, an ex-stats academic and cybernetics enthusiast. Apparently it
is systemic
20 matches
Mail list logo
