Re: [tw] Re: GitHub MD wiki -> TiddlyWiki?

On Thursday, March 16, 2017 at 12:38:38 PM UTC, PMario wrote: > > As I wrote, that should be possible too. ... But I'm not sure, how you > would want to implement it. .. IMO for a "low latency" system, it's > important, that only the stuff that's really needed is running. ... So the > final

Re: [tw] Re: GitHub MD wiki -> TiddlyWiki?

Thanks for the replies everyone. It certainly seems doable! @Pmario, we have not really proposed this as a definite change, and the wiki would still stay on GitHub at least for now. We are interested in options for having the wiki available in our environment though so TiddlyWiki could be a

[tw] GitHub MD wiki -> TiddlyWiki?

Hello, I am part of a project that currently uses a GitHub wiki as it's main source of documentation (https://github.com/belaplatform/bela/wiki). Since it is based on Markdown, is it possible to automagically turn it into a TiddlyWiki? Further, would it be possible to upstream updates from the

Re: [tw] Re: Comparing TiddlyWiki to X

> http://jermolene.com > > On 29 Feb 2016, at 18:43, Jack Armitage <jack.d@gmail.com > > wrote: > > For anyone interested in Eve, they posted an early demo: > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/eve-talk/F4NhgXaqLTU > > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 10:

[tw] Re: Comparing TiddlyWiki to X

For anyone interested in Eve, they posted an early demo: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/eve-talk/F4NhgXaqLTU On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 10:16:48 PM UTC, Jack Armitage wrote: > > Really fascinating, thanks. I was wondering if anyone had attempted to > make IF with

[tw] Re: Comparing TiddlyWiki to X

Really fascinating, thanks. I was wondering if anyone had attempted to make IF with TW and lo and behold. Will take me a while to get through your collection! On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 7:45:13 PM UTC, Jed Carty wrote: > > My favorite use of transclusions I have made is still the

[tw] Re: Comparing TiddlyWiki to X

nado Notes and spent many > days moving my stuff to the next great system. > > Regards, > newbie > > > Am Dienstag, 16. Februar 2016 18:45:12 UTC+1 schrieb Jack Armitage: > >> Hello, >> >> I've been trying to figure out where the future lies for me in te

Re: [tw] Re: Comparing TiddlyWiki to X

we had in the earlier > version of TiddlyWiki but have removed from the core because of the way > that it interferes with double-clicking to select text. As noted above, > there is a plugin to enable the feature for TW5. > > Best wishes > > Jeremy > > > On 16 Fe

[tw] Re: Comparing TiddlyWiki to X

ackend, That would probably limit what browsers it could > run on, though. > > -- Mark > > On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 12:47:14 PM UTC-8, Jack Armitage wrote: >> >> Hi Mat, >> >> I have no experience with VoodooPad. How "fast you tiddle"

[tw] Re: Comparing TiddlyWiki to X

Perhaps that wasn't descriptive enough of what I meant. Go to http://fed.wiki.org/ and double click on some text, and you get a mini-editor essentially per element. I think it's neat but how do you think it would fair in TW? I guess another way of looking at this is I would like a

[tw] Re: Comparing TiddlyWiki to X

Hi Mat, I have no experience with VoodooPad. How "fast you tiddle" I'd say depends > on how/what you implement with TW (for example, I initiated an attempt > called FastNewTiddler with this > in mind... if it is finished, I think it would be very fast).

[tw] Comparing TiddlyWiki to X

Hello, I've been trying to figure out where the future lies for me in terms of Wiki software. There are a few pieces of software I'd like to ask the community about in terms of how they stack up compared to TiddlyWiki if they have experience of any / all. Firstly, did anyone move from Voodoo