Re: [tw5] Re: Easiest and privacy concerned way to publish online for a single user

Thank you Chris, This is also interesting. I have a Raspberry PI model 2B+ taking dust and maybe I can try to set it for this. I do not know if I am enough expert but I ready to learn. Regards Mario Il giorno sab 7 mar 2020 alle ore 03:47 Beckstrom ha scritto: > FWIW my approach is this: > > -

[tw5] Re: Easiest and privacy concerned way to publish online for a single user

FWIW my approach is this: - I use the node.js Tiddlywiki server so I can access it from any device. This is running on a Digital Ocean VPS - I use nginx as a reverse proxy, directing requests to "mysite.com" to the tiddlywiki port - Also in nginx I have access to that URL restricted to only

[tw5] Re: Easiest and privacy concerned way to publish online for a single user

Mat, Thanks for adding that for tiddlyspot, to be clear I was recommending the PHP server solution which has folders that can be secured. No "folder" when using tiddlyspot so the way to protect it is via > restricted access as set in: > > http://tiddlyspot.com/controlpanel > > > Regards

[tw5] Re: Easiest and privacy concerned way to publish online for a single user

> > Gosh..I feel so stupid! I was not thinking that it needs to be set in each > device. > Actually it work now! > LOL! ;-) TonyM wrote: > > Did you protect the folder with a user ID or password?, other wise people > can access it with the url?, and any error on the folder above could make >

[tw5] Re: Easiest and privacy concerned way to publish online for a single user

Great, Did you protect the folder with a user ID or password?, other wise people can access it with the url?, and any error on the folder above could make the url visible. Regards Tony On Saturday, March 7, 2020 at 9:41:49 AM UTC+11, Mario Public wrote: > > Gosh..I feel so stupid! I was not

[tw5] Re: Easiest and privacy concerned way to publish online for a single user

Gosh..I feel so stupid! I was not thinking that it needs to be set in each device. Actually it work now! Thanks! Mario Il giorno venerdì 6 marzo 2020 23:11:10 UTC+1, Mat ha scritto: > > Mario Public wrote: >> >> Apparently changes are saved but they are not. If I browse the wiki from >> the PC

[tw5] Re: Easiest and privacy concerned way to publish online for a single user

Mario My solution would be to use tw-reciever in its own folder and use the server to make that folder secure. To see any files in the folder you will have to login to the server. That's your privacy. Then in tw-reciever you have to provide the credentials to save the wiki. Then if you use a

[tw5] Re: Easiest and privacy concerned way to publish online for a single user

Mario Public wrote: > > Apparently changes are saved but they are not. If I browse the wiki from > the PC or I restart the browser in the phone, they are gone. > The same from an Ipad > I'm probably stating the obvious but: There's a separate saver for tiddlyspot natively built into TW. Make

[tw5] Re: Easiest and privacy concerned way to publish online for a single user

Il giorno venerdì 6 marzo 2020 22:20:38 UTC+1, Mat ha scritto: > > > > In what way does it not work? > > > Apparently changes are saved but they are not. If I browse the wiki from the PC or I restart the browser in the phone, they are gone. The same from an Ipad Mario -- You received this

[tw5] Re: Easiest and privacy concerned way to publish online for a single user

Mario Public wrote: > > I was able to create the tiddlyspot site using the site referenced but > only on Chrome. Firefox failed at last step. > Yes, that is a known quirk (noted halfway down here ). But it is only for the first

[tw5] Re: Easiest and privacy concerned way to publish online for a single user

Hi Mario, One more option, in contrast to TiddlySpot running under https would be Gitch. See https://nota-bene.glitch.me/ Good luck! Thomas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

[tw5] Re: Easiest and privacy concerned way to publish online for a single user

store.php needs some tweaks to match changes in PHP. They are mentioned at the bottom of https://tiddlywiki.com/#Saving%20on%20a%20PHP%20Server There's also a newer PHP saver: https://github.com/sendwheel/tw-receiver Haven't used it, but at least it's been updated. But I wouldn't think your

[tw5] Re: Easiest and privacy concerned way to publish online for a single user

Mario Public > > > The safest way would be to store the TW on my hosting website space, but I > was unable to to do that (changes are not saved). > Just FYI, I use local save with follow on auto-FTP to do it. IMO if you have a site, use it. It is better addressing. There are various solutions

[tw5] Re: Easiest and privacy concerned way to publish online for a single user

Mario Public wrote: > > I was able to create the tiddlyspot site using the site referenced but > only on Chrome. > RIGHT. It fails of FF on creation. After it should be okay on FF. TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To

[tw5] Re: Easiest and privacy concerned way to publish online for a single user

Good obseravations. Just to update: I was able to create the tiddlyspot site using the site referenced but only on Chrome. Firefox failed at last step. The site is working but not from my android phone, differently from the google drive extension. The safest way would be to store the TW on my

[tw5] Re: Easiest and privacy concerned way to publish online for a single user

Right. But from end-user point of view the chain of connect matters. It is only as good as the Weakest Link. Mark S. wrote: > I actually trust Google to do it's job. I expect they know more about > security than hand-made PHP locations. > What concerns me is the intermediary software that

[tw5] Re: Easiest and privacy concerned way to publish online for a single user

I actually trust Google to do it's job. I expect they know more about security than hand-made PHP locations. What concerns me is the intermediary software that connects to Google, about which I know nothing, and which has a reference address that questionably offers to change things on my

[tw5] Re: Easiest and privacy concerned way to publish online for a single user

Mark S., Right. I think the oomph of that post is that we kinda get into trust issues on cloud dependencies not in a TW fold. I think that may get worse over time. The problem is becoming the "supplicant daughter" who has to accept poor information, rather than a robust proven protected TW

[tw5] Re: Easiest and privacy concerned way to publish online for a single user

As an aside, how are people using Google drive now? The link for google drive on TiddlyWiki.com leads to a 404 page. The link on tiddly toolmap leads to a chrome store. The problem there is that the reference site (http://lordratte.info/tiddlydrive/) leads to two warnings from ublock

[tw5] Re: Easiest and privacy concerned way to publish online for a single user

Dear Mat Thank you! I will give it a try! Mario Il giorno venerdì 6 marzo 2020 15:50:58 UTC+1, Mat ha scritto: > > Hands down, tiddlyspot is the simplest solution. And the easiest way to > set one up is probably here: http://tiddlywiki5.tiddlyspot.com/ > > Other than "not giving out your url",

[tw5] Re: Easiest and privacy concerned way to publish online for a single user

Hands down, tiddlyspot is the simplest solution. And the easiest way to set one up is probably here: http://tiddlywiki5.tiddlyspot.com/ Other than "not giving out your url", you can restrict access to it by going to http://yourtiddlyspot.tiddlyspot.com/controlpanel It is probably not *secure*