Re: [tw5] Re: import from Org-Mode

Hi > One excellent plugin that helps with organizing sprawling tiddlers is > TiddlyMap. thanks :) > It was great in the beginning, but since TiddlyMap uses node titles as > node names, and now I have a lot of anonymous tiddlers, it no longer > helps. So recently, I no longer run the TW native

[tw5] Re: import from Org-Mode

I'm the author of the tiddlywiki-org repo Martian linked to above. I haven't updated the elisp files for 2+ years, but I use it every day. You *do* get the best of all worlds and skip the conversion overhead. Here are some observations looking back. .tid is basically a container format, so it

[tw5] Re: import from Org-Mode

Hi, I've been thinking about this (using Org-mode and TW as mutually-beneficial systems), and I suspect that Org is a poor means of approaching TW's concerns regarding hypertext. With that said, I think that the combination of them both can be useful and easier done than you might be

[tw5] Re: import from Org-Mode

This may be interesting also https://github.com/whacked/tiddlywiki-org Though I didn't try it yet. On Tuesday, 26 June 2018 04:21:30 UTC+3, Shay Shaked wrote: > > I'm looking around and I see a lot of Emacs references, a few less (but > still a lot) Org-Mode references, but I don't see something

Re: [tw5] Re: import from Org-Mode

Ha. That's a full circle right there :) On Thu, Jun 28, 2018, 13:27 Scott Kingery wrote: > I found this tool long ago called Pandoc. https://pandoc.org/index.html > Pandoc lets you convert files from one markup format into another. > > Not sure how much it will help in this case (if at all) but

[tw5] Re: import from Org-Mode

I found this tool long ago called Pandoc. https://pandoc.org/index.html Pandoc lets you convert files from one markup format into another. Not sure how much it will help in this case (if at all) but I thought I'd drop it here in anyway.. -- You received this message because you are

[tw5] Re: import from Org-Mode

The author of the exporter from org-mode to tiddlywiki has just fixed the problem. Works fine with the latest version from GitHub. Il giorno martedì 26 giugno 2018 16:37:16 UTC+2, LDL ha scritto: > > I have the same problem on my machine. Looks

[tw5] Re: import from Org-Mode

I have the same problem on my machine. Looks like :export-block is no longer supported in new versions of org-mode. I opened an issue on the github project page , should be easy to fix. Il giorno martedì 26 giugno 2018 14:06:34 UTC+2, Shay

[tw5] Re: import from Org-Mode

I'm running out of time and I'm going to be late for work, but this work is more interesting... I identified the following "problem" (not a bug, a feature!). In TW, ~ is used to cancel CamelCase. In Org, this is used to indicate a code line (similar to ` in TW). The issue is, as you might

[tw5] Re: import from Org-Mode

So seems like I answered my own question, mostly anyway, without realizing. Since TW handles raw HTML rather well, it's rather easy to just export Org to HTML to a buffer (in Emacs, this means it doesn't actually save as an HTML file, it just throws the HTML code into another buffer, or

[tw5] Re: import from Org-Mode

This looks very promising LDL, but it gives me an error (unknown keyword: export-block). This is in line 47 in ox-tiddly.el. I'm no programmer, but it looks like "export block" is outdated and needs to be updated to whatever the new syntax is. As for the discussion going on with Tony and Mark,

[tw5] Re: import from Org-Mode

You can try this exporter: https://github.com/dfeich/org8-wikiexporters that should give you a tid file via the standard export interface of org-mode Il giorno martedì 26 giugno 2018 03:21:30 UTC+2, Shay Shaked ha scritto: > > I'm looking around and I see a lot of Emacs references, a few less

[tw5] Re: import from Org-Mode

Thanks Shay, I would find it easier to address the problems you raise with tiddlyWiki "couldn't use it for because it's rather static, requires revisions, and doesn't work well on phone " which for my uses, seems untrue. Many conversations proceed ours about alternative markup/mark down,

[tw5] Re: import from Org-Mode

Comment #2 The problem with orgmode was that it was too easy for one note to "leak" into the next with just a single keystroke. The Android app didn't work or look anything like the real orgmode, and the synchronization was unreliable. And, like all emacs productions, you needed to memorize a

[tw5] Re: import from Org-Mode

Orgmode has tags ... and it has headers that have relationships to each other that would ordinarily be represented also by tags. If I recall, you can export orgmode to html. Then you could use the slicer edition to cut the html up into tiddlers. Of course, that wouldn't give you any of the

[tw5] Re: import from Org-Mode

OK, let me make an attempt at explaining better... slightly. Org-mode works within Emacs. It's hard to fully explain Org-mode because it has many, many features. But, for the needs of converting to .tid files, we don't need even half of it's features. Org-mode in its' basic for (an .org

[tw5] Re: import from Org-Mode

The full Org Mode of Emacs would require a parser for TW. Org mode is basically an "outliner" but it's actually about as sophisticated as you can get in plain text in what it does. It would need interest. Probably the central issue would be whether TW does it's functions already (in a

[tw5] Re: import from Org-Mode

Shay, Your question depends on someone knowing the emacs and org-mode references you have made (I do not), and someone may very well know what you are talking about, however if you opened this question up to include examples, such that people with extensive tiddlywiki but not emacs org