Re: [tw] Re: Announcing TiddlyWiki 2.6.0 Beta 1
*Has the TiddleySaver file changed between 2.5.3 and 2.6.0b1? Yes; it has been signed with the new UnaMesa certificate. *Does the JQuery upgrade mean anything to end-users? jQuery 1.4 comes with significant performance enhancements. Apart from that, as usual the benefits of jQuery mostly come to end-users indirectly via plugins, as developers make use of the functionality. -- F. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlyw...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
[tw] Re: Announcing TiddlyWiki 2.6.0 Beta 1
On Mar 11, 4:01 pm, FND f...@gmx.net wrote: This release includes a variety of bugfixes and enhancements. Would it be possible to add support for excludeLists to the tagging macro as well? I have a number of tiddlers that have no content but each contain a list of unique tags in order to create a 'master list' of tags in combination with the IntelliTagger plugin. I'd like to tag these tiddlers with 'excludeLists' so that they do not appear in the tagging list of a tiddler. Thanks Jonathan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlyw...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
[tw] Re: Announcing TiddlyWiki 2.6.0 Beta 1
*WindowTitle tiddler looks like it is just a redirection layer, calling the SiteTitle and SiteSubtitle tiddlers. *Has the TiddleySaver file changed between 2.5.3 and 2.6.0b1? *What is the purpose of the creator field, as opposed to the existing modifier field? Are you planning to add this to the default ViewTemplate? *Does the JQuery upgrade mean anything to end-users? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlyw...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
[tw] Re: Announcing TiddlyWiki 2.6.0 Beta 1
*WindowTitle tiddler looks like it is just a redirection layer, calling the SiteTitle and SiteSubtitle tiddlers. The *default* for the title is the same as before... however, the shadow [[WindowTitle]] makes it *much* easier to customize the content/format of the titlebar, so that it can be different from the SiteTitle/SiteSubtitle default combination. *What is the purpose of the creator field, as opposed to the existing modifier field? Are you planning to add this to the default ViewTemplate? The creator field is stored *once*, when a tiddler is first created. The modifier field is updated every time the tiddler is re-written. For some use-cases, especially shared and/or server-based documents, the distinction between the creator and modifier of a tiddler can be significant for tracking, notification, and version control handling. enjoy, -e -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlyw...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
[tw] Re: Announcing TiddlyWiki 2.6.0 Beta 1
Considering the emphasis on microkernel and the fact that TW not is very suitable for multiple collaborators (and even officially named a personal notebook) I'm wondering why even bother with creator or modifier. It clutters and IMO it seems more suitable as a plugin? And, if in a plugin, an option to put this and perhaps even the date information as field data... On Mar 12, 2:35 am, Eric Shulman elsdes...@gmail.com wrote: *WindowTitle tiddler looks like it is just a redirection layer, calling the SiteTitle and SiteSubtitle tiddlers. The *default* for the title is the same as before... however, the shadow [[WindowTitle]] makes it *much* easier to customize the content/format of the titlebar, so that it can be different from the SiteTitle/SiteSubtitle default combination. *What is the purpose of the creator field, as opposed to the existing modifier field? Are you planning to add this to the default ViewTemplate? The creator field is stored *once*, when a tiddler is first created. The modifier field is updated every time the tiddler is re-written. For some use-cases, especially shared and/or server-based documents, the distinction between the creator and modifier of a tiddler can be significant for tracking, notification, and version control handling. enjoy, -e -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlyw...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
[tw] Re: Announcing TiddlyWiki 2.6.0 Beta 1
Considering the emphasis on microkernel and the fact that TW not is very suitable for multiple collaborators (and even officially named a personal notebook) I'm wondering why even bother with creator or modifier. The 'modifier' field has *always* been included in the TW core data, and the 'creator' field was first implemented as a TiddlyTools' [[CoreTweaks]] plugin, in direct response to several requests from the community for the feature, in order to support real- world use cases. Although TW is quite obviously well-suited for individuals, many scenarios involve a single file being copied, shared, edited and merged amongst a small group of people. Just because a document is self-contained and edited locally by one person, does not mean that it will never be shared or edited by others at some point in the future. In addition, you can import/export individual tiddlers into other documents, so that a single document may include tiddler content edited by several people, even if that document is only ever directly modified by one 'owner'. Also, there are server-side adaptations of TiddlyWiki, such as http://www.TiddlyWeb.com, which provide robust remote storage mechanisms, with support for multiple users, permissions, revision tracking, etc. All of these features depend heavily on being able to track both the creator and last modifier information reliably. It clutters and IMO it seems more suitable as a plugin? And, if in a plugin, an option to put this and perhaps even the date information as field data... Obviously, the creator field *can* be implemented as a plugin using custom field data, since that is how it originated. However, by placing this very small piece of code into the TW core, it ensures that *all* new TW documents will properly support these fields in a standard manner, so that even if a document is not directly shared or hosted on a server, any tiddlers that are exported from those documents can be tracked by both creator and last modifier. enjoy, -e Eric Shulman TiddlyTools / ELS Design Studios -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlyw...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
