I *hate* to admit this, but Im one of those users that arent sure how to
install/use tiddlyserver :L
On Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 7:36:16 AM UTC-6, coda coder wrote:
>
> Josiah is right. It's a lot easier than it sounds.
>
> Personally, I think TS should come WITH node.exe and a default
Josiah is right. It's a lot easier than it sounds.
Personally, I think TS should come WITH node.exe and a default
settings.json preconfigured to serve flatfile TWs from /documents.
When you (Arlen) then add the config system you've mentioned (perhaps
served from config.html, yet to be
Ciao Arlen
Just an FYI. Over on Twitter I got a reply about methods of install that
said ...
TiddlyServer sounds a bit heavy for me (I should know more about stuff like
> configuring servers and javascript development and such, but actually don't
> know so much) (full post
>
Ciao Arlen
I found it stable and works WELL.
For MYSELF I'm CONTENT.
For NEW USERS I don't think its quite so easy at first. I'm not quite sure
what the solution is.
One thought I had before was making it bit more like an "installer", with
some interactive questions that then auto-make
Hello @Arlen Beiler,
what I like most is that it restarts instantly with pm2 (pm2 gracefulReload
mytiddlyserverscript --> done)
I couldn't get such a fast reload performance using tiddlywiki server
edition
thanks for TiddlyServer,
Simon
--
You received this message because you are
Arlen
1. What do you like about it?
- It works very well once setup and supports my single file wikis and
node JS installs all from one IP Address or local host in the browser
- I use it all day, and every day on my laptop/desktop
2. What is one improvement that would significantly
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:32:22 PM UTC-6, coda coder wrote:
>
>
>>
>> 3. What use case should it be extended to fit, in your opinion?
>>
>
> None that I can think of. I'll defer to others on this.
>
>
See? Almost as soon as I posted my answer above, someone else asks for
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 2:45:35 PM UTC-6, Arlen Beiler wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
> I would like to hear your thoughts on TiddlyServer now that it has been
> out for a few months. So here are a few questions.
>
> 1. What do you like about it?
>
It just works.
I like that I can use
8 matches
Mail list logo
