[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

I agree, it is pretty amazing. I had some initial issues getting it to work but I think that was because I tried right around the time IBM bought out Cloudant and the "set-up" process changed. Instead I started messing around with other things. I always meant to get back to it. Yesterday, I did

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

Hello all. Glad to see that more people is getting interested by NoteSelf. I'm sorry to read people is having some trouble. To be honest, the new Cloudant policies have hit the NS community hard. However, I have plans to mitigate this problem (see below). I want to make some clarifications

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

Mark et all Yesterday I installed CouchDB on My Windows 10 64bit, I have not got a noteself to connect to it yet. There seems to be a gap in the instructions on how to configure a tiddlywiki DB. This would allow me to look at the database structure that NoteSelf is using and thus determine if

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 1:07:39 AM UTC-7, Jed Carty wrote: > > SQL is optimised around having a known number of columns with a known type > in each column which isn't a good match for tiddlywiki because tiddlers can > have any number of custom fields they would all be stored as a single

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

I don't have any real experience using NoteSelf but I do know a bit about databases. You can have variable length columns in MySQL, each column has a type which determines the allowed content and some types have limits on the size but text columns can have variable lengths. SQL is optimised

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

Diego, That is a fairly brutal practice, why do you do it? If you can do that regularly enough, why not also backup your DB at the same time (or simple export tiddlers). If you do not do it surely the reliability for your NoteSelf wiki goes up for you/ Regards Tony On Tuesday, April 24,

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

Mark et al.. I would of thought the tiddler could be saved as a "blob", that is the fields are just more details in the tiddler, all just one big text file. They only become meaningful when they are loaded into the Tiddly-wiki which knows about fields. The question is can you have variable

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

Ciao Diego Look at your browser settings. What you want is to NOT delete "Local Storage" / "Offline ... Data". Not sure if all browsers allow you to pick and choose. My FF does ... Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

Josiah, For me, I *frequently* erase everything in my browser, and since IBM Cloud resets after 30 days of inactivity, that also isnt a fair backup option for me. I guess to use noteself Ill have to stop erasing my browser? On Monday, April 23, 2018 at 1:52:34 PM UTC-5, @TiddlyTweeter

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

Diego Mesa wrote: > > As I am terrified of losing data ... > A few notes on this in relation to NoteSelf. Understandable IF the server clocks-out AND the browser clocks-out and you didn't do any additional backups. I do think (manual, redundant) backup-methodology for NoteSelf could be made a

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

As I am terrified of losing data, I would just like to emphasize this (this isn't a criticism of noteself, just an FYI for those using IBM Cloud): *IBM Cloud Lite plans are deleted after 30 days of inactivity.* On Monday, April 23, 2018 at 6:43:02 AM UTC-5, Diego Mesa wrote: > > Hey all, > > I

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

Good point Tony! I suppose couch/pouch is a better match for the way TW stores data, where any tiddler could have any number of fields. But, what if you limited the number of fields exposed? Just title, caption, text, created, modified, tags and a couple extra (field1, field2). Then maybe it

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

Would it be possible to provide something like a docker image for a backend so people could host their own noteself db on their own server or a raspberry pi? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

Hey Tony, Thanks for your reply. As this storage model is based on a database that stores revisions inside it, my backup strategy would be to keep one or two database copies around at a time, as opposed to an .html file. Is this possible? On Monday, April 23, 2018 at 8:33:37 AM UTC-5, TonyM

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

If I could build a cloudant server on a cpanel host php/apatche I would offer some free accounts But I do not know if or how. Perhaps someone could build a mysql or maria db version. I think that would realy take off because there are many ways to host those dbs. Regards Tony -- You

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

Diego, I belive if you tap save icon twice or more rapidly you will be prompted to download the whole wiki with you content included. You could also go to advanced search > filter > select all tiddlers except system tiddlers and down load only regular tiddlers to a json file and drop import

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

Hey all, I have some questions about noteself maybe someone can help me answer! I understand it uses your browsers local storage. I am used to using nodejs, and keep my tiddlywiki folder in my dropbox. That means I have a folder with many .tid files I can see and touch. I also *frequently*

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

I'm still using cloudant.., its not stopping I don't think but the shared plan is no longer available. On a tangential note if Danielo is around.. NoteSelf doesn't seem to be displaying my templates. Ste -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

Thanks willw The cause? It was CORS. Of course! > > OK, I find your instrux on github... but I believe I already had CORS set up. In the bluemix-cloudant dashboard:

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

Mat I had similar problems with failed logins on moving from cloudant to IBM bluemix. It's working now, with Danielo's help. The cause? It was CORS. Of course! My instructions for configuring CORS are posted March 18th on this github issue (with links to IBM documentation):

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

BTW, here 's a positive review from someone. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

Something always glitches when attempt at getting NoteSelf to work properly. Maybe with Bluemix it will work so could someone please give some guidance? I successfully set up a new Bluemix account (via here ) and created a new

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

Danielo's solution made Tiddlywiki "complete" for me personally. I've been running it since December and it syncs way better than Evernote or Onenote. Which isn't saying much, it's being more than gracious to call those two pieces of software malicious garbage. Noteself syncs REALLY well. The

Re: [tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

Ciao Arlen I think the kind of broad understanding you have is very good. IMO, lack of near any resources discussing and showing, comparatively, the various routes and their outcomes in different cases is negatively impacting TiddlyWiki uptake. How can you adopt something you don't

Re: [tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

Considering that this is tied to the browser, which is tied to the computer, I have now switched to using Dropbox synced data folders, which work about the same. There are three or four different ways to serve them: NodeJS TiddlyWiki, TiddlyServer, an electron-based shim which loads the filesystem

[tw5] Re: NoteSelf uses local browser storage seamlessly with a remote synching server

Hello everyone, Sorry for all the inconveniences. Yes, it is true, cloudant as an independent platform is being closed. However, you can sign-up for a bluemix account and continue to use the free tier of cloudant inside the bluemix platform. The problem is that sign up is not as easy as