Re: [twdev] Re: TiddlySpace development(s)

2010-06-25 Thread chris . dent
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, TheFlyingNematode wrote: This is dead brilliant! Glad you are interested. Some time has passed since you posted this so I thought I would throw out some quick responses about how some of these things have evolved as we've continued work: # Save changes doesn't seem to do

Re: [twdev] Re: Dealing with non text tiddlers in TiddlyWiki

2010-06-25 Thread chris . dent
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, Eric Shulman wrote: Note that, because attachment tiddlers use ***TW-native section syntax***, you can easily edit it as needed by employing the standard TW editor, without needing any custom fields at all. It also makes it easy to embed the content of individual sections

[twdev] Re: Dealing with non text tiddlers in TiddlyWiki

2010-06-25 Thread Eric Shulman
While this is good for TiddlyWiki, especially those which are file:/// based, it is less good for server-side storage systems that store individual tiddlers (rather than whole wikis). I don't agree. The design that I have *already implemented* and which is *widely used* in the community does

Re: [twdev] Re: Dealing with non text tiddlers in TiddlyWiki

2010-06-25 Thread chris . dent
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Eric Shulman wrote: While this is good for TiddlyWiki, especially those which are file:/// based, it is less good for server-side storage systems that store individual tiddlers (rather than whole wikis). I don't agree. The design that I have *already implemented* and

Re: [twdev] Re: Dealing with non text tiddlers in TiddlyWiki

2010-06-25 Thread FND
In summary: I don't see *any* net advantage to hiding attachment data in custom fields. It seems contrary to the 'open information' nature of TiddlyWiki, and makes it harder to share that information across the entire TiddlyVerse I understand where you're coming from, and coming from a

Re: [twdev] Re: Dealing with non text tiddlers in TiddlyWiki

2010-06-25 Thread Paul Downey
I'll have to do more pondering on how we might reconcile these requirements before making up my mind... In the hope of helping the requirements discussion, I've started to put together a small space demonstrating using SVG, and other binary tiddlers using a simple image chili:

Re: [twdev] Re: TiddlySpace development(s)

2010-06-25 Thread chris . dent
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Måns wrote: I think it would be very/more practical if the UI presented a public and private tiddler as only ONE tiddler with two modes (same title: red if not published yet, blue if private public) - then you'd need a published/private switchmode-button to be able to

[twdev] Re: adaptation of ListNav goes wrong: jQuery problem?

2010-06-25 Thread wgw
Mario, Wow! That did it! Thanks so much for all your help. I hope to have a useful macro at the end of it all. I updated the macro on your site (with some other tweaks), so it won't crash now (fingers crossed!). Here is the pertinent bit of code that I klutzed together, following your

[twdev] Re: adaptation of ListNav goes wrong: jQuery problem?

2010-06-25 Thread wgw
(hope this message isn't a duplicate... I did not see my first reply so I'm resending) Mario, Wow! That did it! Thanks so much for all your help. I hope to have a useful macro at the end of it all. I updated the macro on your site (with some other tweaks), so it won't crash now (fingers

[twdev] Re: adaptation of ListNav goes wrong: jQuery problem?

2010-06-25 Thread wgw
Mario, Wow! That did it! Thanks so much for all your help. I hope to have a useful macro at the end of it all. I updated the macro on your site (with some other tweaks), so it won't crash now (fingers crossed!). Here is the pertinent bit of code that I klutzed together, following your

[twdev] Re: adaptation of ListNav goes wrong: jQuery problem?

2010-06-25 Thread PMario
Cool !                     var itmfound                     $.each(items, function(i, itm) {                        itmfound=itm.innerHTML;                         $(li+itmfound+/li).appendTo(#ListTableColumn); Popping the innerHTML out of that itm object seems to do the trick.