In a related activity I have discovered a way to identify a code tiddler.
This would permit referencing the fields in an intermediate tiddler
- eg CurrentTiddler transcludes template tiddler
- The template tiddler knows its own name and can reference its own
fields for config settings
All,
Jeremy, Thanks for that info.
I am keen to maintain maximum compatibility but I also have private wikis I
just want to improve for myself, and simplify the workflow to secure other
icons and binary ones for favicons.
This may need a bespoke solution with a set of caveats. Such as an
Joshua,
I think that explanation is useful.
The fact is I write most of my code with currentTiddler the target and use
set or list to alter this value as needed.
I have being using the templating mechanism to great effect, using
`{{||template}}` and relying on the context, ie currentTiddler
Im bumping this for Tony!
On Friday, March 27, 2020 at 12:56:56 AM UTC-5, TonyM wrote:
>
> Humbly I say "bump".
>
> please at least give me some direction
>
> Tony
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this
Aaah, that may explain why TheDiveO's plugin hasn't been updated in a
while. I will definitely need to read up on this. FontAwesome also offers
SVGs, and I would much rather avoid the issues called out in those articles.
Thanks!
Joshua Fontany
On Saturday, April 4, 2020 at 1:33:25 AM UTC-7,
Tony,
It took me a little while to wrap my head around how the short-form
`{{tiddler||template}}` is "rendered".
Basically, the <$transclude> widget, without a "parent" <$tiddler> widget
wrapped around it IS a "template widget" because anything transcluded will
use the "current"
@Jed, the readme
https://ooktech-tw.gitlab.io/plugins/mousey/#%24%3A%2Fplugins%2FOokTech%2FMousey%2Freadme
points to a missing tiddler, i.e it says "If you are going to make popups
using this read A note about popups
Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
>
> It’s too late to change the interpretation of the icon field [...]
>
With that said, I agree with Tony that the general idea to be able to
insert emojis or other stuff directly in the icon field would be really
neat and makes sense. I guess it's one for TWX (...a
Hi Tony
It’s too late to change the interpretation of the icon field without breaking
backwards compatibility.
Icon fonts like fontawesome are actually now somewhat controversial, and aren't
recommended for contemporary web development:
