[twdev] Re: Looking for the Rosetta Stone

2018-12-27 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Mario Appreciate your detail on this but it misses something. Say a person writes a Tiddler in a TW of "text to be read". What is the problem copying it if the "site" indicates NO copyright conditions? Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[twdev] Re: Looking for the Rosetta Stone

2018-12-27 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Joe & Mario My sense of this is 1 - Joe, I doubt any of the stuff (i.e. Tiddler text like you see in blogs) you've encountered and want to recycle is in anyway problematic. WHY? The creator never thought to (c) it. If they had it would be likely the PAGE would gave a CLEAR copyright

[twdev] Re: Looking for the Rosetta Stone

2018-12-26 Thread joearms
Thanks Mario, that was good to know. What concerns me more are TWs I've found "in the wild" - can I quote from them if I can't get permission from the author and if there are no apparent rights in the TW file Cheers /Joe On Tuesday, 25 December 2018 15:14:32 UTC+1, PMario wrote: > > Hi

[twdev] Re: Looking for the Rosetta Stone

2018-12-25 Thread PMario
Hi Joe, Everything used from tiddlywiki.com is licensed, based on the following definitions from 2 CLAs see: https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/tree/master/licenses more specific for individuals:

[twdev] Re: Looking for the Rosetta Stone

2018-12-24 Thread joearms
On copyright: I was thinking more of books - there have been several calls in the TW lists for a TW book (and I'd like to see one - if I knew the TW well enough I could even think of writing one) The problem is publishers require written authorization notes for everything that is not the

[twdev] Re: Looking for the Rosetta Stone

2018-12-21 Thread TonyM
Joe, Unless you bring in a tiddler from an external source such as a plugin with its own licence, I belive you can assume every tiddler is operating under the overall tiddlywiki licence. As an open source project tiddlywiki is not really a place in which to put restrictivly licenced code, but

[twdev] Re: Looking for the Rosetta Stone

2018-12-21 Thread TonyM
Joe, Unless you bring in a tiddler from an external source such as a plugin with its own licence, I belive you can assume every tiddler is operating under the overall tiddlywiki licence. As an open source project tiddlywiki is not really a place in which to put restrictivly licenced code, but

[twdev] Re: Looking for the Rosetta Stone

2018-12-20 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Joe, spot on ... info is there but all over the place. Us lingerers kinda figure out how to find it but we should get our act together to make better sense of it and connect it up so it can be found easily. ... concerning copyright. Probably an easier issue. Plugins often carry

[twdev] Re: Looking for the Rosetta Stone

2018-12-20 Thread joearms
Thanks - seems to me that everything I want to know is out there somewhere but not organised at one place and in an order that makes sense to me. I retrospect it would be nice every tiddler has a copyright/reuse field so I know If I can reuse the tiddler without infringing on usage rights.

[twdev] Re: Looking for the Rosetta Stone

2018-12-20 Thread Diego Mesa
The great Eric Shulman explained it beautifully here: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/3NdhzmCD-Rs/yoxtHnBCAAAJ The bottom line is reveal is a IF statement like this: <$reveal type="match" default=<> text=<> > This content is shown if variable1 and variable2 match On

[twdev] Re: Looking for the Rosetta Stone

2018-12-20 Thread joearms
On Thursday, 20 December 2018 18:59:56 UTC+1, Diego Mesa wrote: > > Joe, > > Coming from other languages, in my mind the "reveal" widget is the closest > thing to an IF. Wikify is a unique construction to TW. Also note that the > great Evan Balster wrote a "Condition" Plugin: > Goodness - I

[twdev] Re: Looking for the Rosetta Stone

2018-12-20 Thread Diego Mesa
Joe, Coming from other languages, in my mind the "reveal" widget is the closest thing to an IF. Wikify is a unique construction to TW. Also note that the great Evan Balster wrote a "Condition" Plugin: http://evanbalster.com/tiddlywiki/formulas.html#Condition%20Plugin which exposes <$if>,

[twdev] Re: Looking for the Rosetta Stone

2018-12-20 Thread joearms
On Thursday, 20 December 2018 14:57:39 UTC+1, Mohammad Rahmani wrote: > > Joe, > > have you seen: > https://tiddlywiki.com/#Widgets > Yes - I wanted to know the most important :-) > > These are list of widgets in TW core: > > The below five widgets are my choice for programming TW and I

[twdev] Re: Looking for the Rosetta Stone

2018-12-20 Thread Mohammad Rahmani
Joe, have you seen: https://tiddlywiki.com/#Widgets These are list of widgets in TW core: The below five widgets are my choice for programming TW and I think these are 1. list 2. set (and vars) 3. reveal (for conditional operation) 4. wikify 5. import (scope of variable and

[twdev] Re: Looking for the Rosetta Stone

2018-12-20 Thread Mohammad Rahmani
Joe, The Tiddlywiki user forum seems to be more active and seems to have more members, so I also recommend to post there: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/tiddlywiki Best Mohammad -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To

[twdev] Re: Looking for the Rosetta Stone

2018-12-20 Thread Mohammad Rahmani
Hello Joe, I see you are working with TW and raise some interesting and fundamental questions! Most of them are answered nicely and I see you have very good discussion from programming point of view. It would be great if you could put these in a TW wiki and share them to community. There is a