All,
Rob has fixed the issue with his plugin, so we can now have fuzzy search!!!
On Thursday, June 28, 2018 at 11:09:21 AM UTC-5, Rob Hoelz wrote:
>
> Hi everyone!
>
> Diego was kind enough to bring this discussion to my attention - I plan on
> fixing up that issue he ran into.
>
> Jeremy - if
Hi everyone!
Diego was kind enough to bring this discussion to my attention - I plan on
fixing up that issue he ran into.
Jeremy - if you decide to go with lunr.js but not use my plugin, please
feel free to reach out if you have questions about lunr.js! One pitfall I
ran into while upgrading
Hey Jeremy,
Just wanted to let you know of this plugin:
https://github.com/hoelzro/tw-full-text-search
which incorporates lunr.js into TW for full text searching. I just tried
today and am somewhat able to do fuzzy searching with it (does not deal
with immediatel searching properly yet). I
Hey Jeremy,
Thanks for your feedback - I agree search needs to performant. Im glad
you're also looking at these issues!
A priority for me is the inclusion of *fuzzy* searching - a quick look
seems lunr does support it:
https://lunrjs.com/guides/searching.html#fuzzy-matches
but elastic does
Hi Diego
Filter operators are often re-executed and so it's important that they perform
well. For an expensive operation like a search we need to try to cache as much
of the work as we can.
An approach that should work is to introduce a new startup module that tracks
changes to the store in
